Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 21;8:652641. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.652641

Table 5.

Reduction of variation of fat in native breast milk samples of n = 103 subjects, when matching native breast milk batches containing the highest and the lowest macronutrient content, the second highest and the second lowest values, proceeding continuously were combined.

Matching criterium Variation of macronutrient content in batched native breast milk
Fat (g/100 mL) Protein (g/100 mL) Lactose (g/100 mL) Energy (kcal/100 mL)
None 1.5 (0.5, 3.4) 0.6 (0.2, 1.6) 1.3 (0.7, 4.0) 15 (5, 31)
Fat 0.7 (0.5, 1.0) 0.4 (0.3, 0.6) 1.0 (0.8, 1.2) 7.8 (6.2, 10.2)
Protein 1.0 (0.8, 1.4) 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) 0.9 (0.8, 1.2) 10.7 (8.8, 13.9)
Lactose 1.1 (0.8, 1.4) 0.4 (0.3, 0.6) 0.6 (0.5, 0.8) 10.8 (8.2, 14.3)
Energy 0.8 (0.6, 1.0) 0.4 (0.3, 0.6) 0.9 (0.8, 1.2) 7.4 (5.2, 9.9)

Data show median and interquartiles of ranges Q0.1-Q0.9 (quantile) (level 2 analysis). Colors highlight the effect of matching on the selected macronutrient compared with native breast milk, yellow - fat, red - protein, green - lactose, blue - energy.