Table 2.
The potato yield and its components influenced by ZNC through irrigation in the field.a
| Year | Treatments (ng/ml) | Yield (kg/hm2) | Increased Production rate (%) | Number of tubers per plant | Tuber weight per plant (g) | Rate of small tubers (%) | Rate of medium tubers (%) | Rate of Large tubers (%) | Commercialization rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 0 | 44,137.00±398.24 c | 4.83±0.21 a | 774.33±19.18 c | 11.08±1.70 b | 74.39±4.86 a | 14.53±4.23 bc | 88.91±1.70 a | |
| 1 | 52,447.60±1,990.23 a | 18.83 | 4.73±0.12 a | 920.13±34.92 a | 9.14±0.96 b | 63.37±2.90 c | 27.49±2.16 a | 90.86±0.96 a | |
| 10 | 47,237.80±1,919.54 b | 7.03 | 4.80±0.10 a | 828.74±33.67 b | 7.64±1.22 b | 76.40±4.23 a | 15.96±3.07 b | 92.36±1.22 a | |
| 100 | 33,090.40±390.99 d | −25.03 | 4.50±0.17 a | 580.50±6.86 d | 20.69±4.71 a | 69.53±5.79 b | 9.77±5.63 c | 79.31±4.71 b | |
| 2020 | 0 | 43,135.70±854.47 c | 4.43±0.06 b | 756.77±14.99 c | 10.54±1.43 b | 66.92±3.42 a | 22.54±3.79 b | 89.46±1.43 a | |
| 1 | 54,444.50±1,931.83 a | 26.22 | 4.83±0.06 a | 955.17±33.90 a | 7.14±1.11 b | 58.62±3.87 ab | 34.24±2.83 a | 92.86±1.11 a | |
| 10 | 49,096.00±2,623.20 b | 13.82 | 4.23±0.12 b | 861.33±46.03 b | 10.50±3.20 b | 55.75±2.42 b | 33.75±4.70 a | 89.50±3.20 a | |
| 100 | 30,831.30±1,592.30 d | −28.52 | 4.40±0.17 b | 540.90±57.91 d | 21.89±5.60 a | 66.80±4.63 a | 10.59±3.59 c | 77.39±6.11 b |
a
The statistical analysis is the same as Table 1. Different letters represent significant differences compared with 0 ng/ml.