Table 4.
Interaction effects between attribute levels and sociodemographic characteristics
Attribute | Gender | Professional category | Age (years) | ||||||||
Female | Male | Nurse | Nurse Assistant | Other paramedical | Biomedical | Administrative/ Technical |
18–34 | 35–49 | 50+ | ||
OR (95% CI) | |||||||||||
Vaccine efficacy | 90% | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||
50% | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.05* | |||
(0.04 to 0.07) | (0.05 to 0.09) | ||||||||||
90%, severe cases | 1.93 | 1.87 | 1.81 | 1.18** | 1.60 | 1.84 | 1.82 | 1.42 | |||
(1.53 to 2.43) | (1.46 to 2.33) | ||||||||||
Indirect protection | Unknown | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||||
Individual protection only | 0.53 | 0.42 | 0.55 | ||||||||
(0.39 to 0.71) | |||||||||||
Control of epidemic | 4.77 | 2.53*** | 2.43*** | ||||||||
(3.44 to 6.61) | |||||||||||
Safely meet older people | 6.84 | 3.76*** | 3.08*** | ||||||||
(5.10 to 9.17) | |||||||||||
Vaccine safety | Absence of severe and frequent side effects | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Benefit>risk, even for young | 0.37 | 0.52* | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.52* | 0.60** | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.46* | 0.39 | |
(0.32 to 0.44) | (0.27 to 0.45) | (0.25 to 0.43) | |||||||||
Strictly monitored across EU | 0.37 | 0.51* | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.42** | 0.46** | |
(0.31 to 0.43) | (0.30 to 0.49) | (0.21 to 0.36) | |||||||||
Protection duration | Annual vaccination | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||||
Unknown duration | 0.67 | 0.49 | 0.40** | ||||||||
(0.52 to 0.87) | |||||||||||
Probably 3 years | 1.24 | 1.36 | 0.94 | ||||||||
Recommendation/ incentive |
MoH asks | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||
Experts without CoI | 1.04 | 0.67* | 1.11 | 0.85 | 1.12 | 0.79 | 0.96 | 1.14* | |||
(0.62 to 1.01) | |||||||||||
80% HCWs EU | 1.47 | 1.16 | 1.43 | 1.23 | 1.25 | 1.16 | 1.44 | 1.31 | |||
(1.16 to 1.84) | (0.91 to 1.47) |
ConjointVac survey among 4346 healthcare and welfare sector workers in France, 18 December 2020 to 1 February 2021.
Asterisks represent the significance level of interaction terms of the given subgroup with the attribute level: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p≤0.001.
95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the main effects in the given subgroup are shown, if they do not overlap 1 (p<0.05).
Lecture note:≥50-year-old participants have significantly (p≤0.001) lower preference weights (OR) to contributing to epidemic control compared with those in the reference group (18-year-old to 34-year-old participants). The effect of ‘control of epidemic’ is significant (p<0.05) only among the group of 18-year-old to 34-year-old participants.
CoI, conflict of interest; EU, European countries; HCWs, healthcare workers; MoH, Ministry of Health.