Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 24;187(2):758–768. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab356

Table 1.

Segregation patterns of homozygous and biallelic T1 mutations

Line T1
T2
Mutation Type Indels Number of Lines Tested M1 (Homozygote) M2 (Homozygote) M1 and M2 (Biallele) Number of New Mutations Number of Reversions
jaz1 #4 Biallele M1: D (TTGACA) 20 5 6 9 0 0
M2: I (A)
jaz1 #19 Homozygote M1: D (ACAGAACTTCCTATTG) 20 20 0 0 0 0
jaz1 #33 Homozygote M1: D (CATTGAC) 20 20 0 0 0 0
jaz1 #41 Homozygote M1: D (ACAGAACTTCCTATTG) 20 20 0 0 0 0
ap1 #10 Homozygote M1: D (T) 20 20 0 0 0 0
ap1 #33 Biallele M1: I (T) 20 6 5 9 0 0
M2: I (C)
ap1 #59 Homozygote M1: D (T) 20 20 0 0 0 0
gai #3 Homozygote M1: D (GTT) 20 20 0 0 0 0
gai #27 Biallele M1: D (T) 20 5 7 8 0 0
M2: D (AGCTGTTCT)
gai #56 Biallele M1: D (G) 20 4 9 7 0 0
M2: D (TT)
tt4 #8 Biallele M1: I (A) 20 6 6 8 0 0
M1: D (CAA)

Twenty T2 seedlings from each T1 homozygous or biallelic line were genotyped by sequencing. M1 and M2 indicate the type of mutation in T1 plants. D indicates deletion and I indicates insertion at target sites.