Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2020 Jun 1;36(2):66–73. doi: 10.2987/20-6931.1

Table 4.

Trap location features of AGO traps and percentage of traps in classified clusters (1, 2) at the intervention (IS) site, Guayama municipality, Puerto Rico from December 2016 to April 2017.

Variable name Units or Descriptive Cluster 1 (n=18) Cluster 2 (n=9)
Trap water temperature °C 26.6 ± 0.2 28.2 ± 0.3
Trap exposure to sun Total / Shade 16.6 / 83.3 77.7 / 22.2
Trap location at property Front / Elsewhere (alongside, backyard) 55.5 / 44.5 66.6 / 33.3
Trap under vegetation No / Yes 61.1 / 38.8 100 / 0
House occupancy Uninhabited / Inhabited 38.8 / 61.1 33.3 / 66.6
Trap water volume Liters 7.3 ± 0.1 6.4 ± 0.2
Pet presence No / Yes 77.7 / 22.2 44.4 / 55.5
Trap’s location background Dark / Light 38.8 / 61.1 0 / 100
Presence of adult mosquitoes alive in infusion chamber* No / Yes 97.0 / 3.0 96.0 / 4.0
Ground cover under trap Grass / Built 5.5 / 94.4 33.3 / 66.6
Trap exposure to rain No / Yes 20 / 80 11.1 / 88.8
*

Following heavy rains, protruded eggs from captured female Ae. aegypti may be washed through the screen into the infusion chamber, then hatch and develop into adults that remain trapped within the infusion chamber.