Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 8;46(3):140–147. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_13_21

Table 2.

Comparison of potential correct prediction capability and their correlation with the surgical findings

SHINKEI STIR DWIBS
Sensitivity (%) 88 75 37.5
Specificity (%) 67 100 100
Accuracy (%) 84 79 47.3
Yates corrected P (Chi-square test done on data): Difference from surgery observations 0.03*
Chi-square - 4.46
0.01*
Chi-square - 6.11
0.2
Chi-square - 1.64
Goodman-Kruskal index of predictive association (lambda) Estimated probability of correct prediction (without knowing surgical results a-priori) (%) 78 67 52

*Statistically significant correlation with surgical findings. SHINKEI: SHeath signal increased with INKed rest-tissue RARE Imaging, STIR: Short-term inversion recovery, DWIBS: Diffusion-weighted imaging with background signal suppression