Table 2.
Comparison of potential correct prediction capability and their correlation with the surgical findings
SHINKEI | STIR | DWIBS | |
---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity (%) | 88 | 75 | 37.5 |
Specificity (%) | 67 | 100 | 100 |
Accuracy (%) | 84 | 79 | 47.3 |
Yates corrected P (Chi-square test done on data): Difference from surgery observations | 0.03* Chi-square - 4.46 |
0.01* Chi-square - 6.11 |
0.2 Chi-square - 1.64 |
Goodman-Kruskal index of predictive association (lambda) Estimated probability of correct prediction (without knowing surgical results a-priori) (%) | 78 | 67 | 52 |
*Statistically significant correlation with surgical findings. SHINKEI: SHeath signal increased with INKed rest-tissue RARE Imaging, STIR: Short-term inversion recovery, DWIBS: Diffusion-weighted imaging with background signal suppression