Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 9;102(5):663–670. doi: 10.1159/000508040

Table 2.

Comparison of clinicopathological findings between the GP and IP groups (n = 54)

GP (n = 11) IP (n = 43) p value
Mean age, years [range] 67.3 [48–89] 65.2 [41–83] 0.72
Gender (male/female) 9/2 26/17 0.29
Operative method (EMR/ESD) 8/3 30/13 1.00
Tumor location (first/second/third portion) 11/0/0 8/31/4 <0.01
Mean tumor size, mm [range] 14.4 [7–25] 10.2 [2–30] <0.05
Coloration (red/isochromatic or white) 8/3 16/27 <0.05
Macroscopic type (0-I/0-IIa/0-IIc) 8/3/0 5/28/10 <0.01
Lobular/granular pattern (+/−) 9/2 2/41 <0.01
Vienna classification (category 3/category 4 or 5) 2/9 30/13 <0.01

GP, gastric phenotype; IP, intestinal phenotype; EMR, endoscopic mucosal resection; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection.