Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;111(8):705–717. doi: 10.1159/000510514

Table 2.

Radiological and pathological tumor size of the total cohort and stratified by imaging modality and pNET localization

Overall
pNETs head
pNETs body/tail
imaging modality N (%) radiological size, mm pathological size, mm difference, mm N (%) radiological size, mm pathological size, mm difference, mm N (%) radiological size, mm pathological size, mm difference, mm
All 73 (100) 22 [3–160] 21 [4–200] −1 [–40 to 22] 26 (35.6) 19 [3–43] 15 [4–50] −1 [–17 to 22] 58 (79.5) 22 [5–160] 21 [4–200] 0 [–40 to 20]
MRI 36 (49.3) 23 [3–43] 21 [4–50] −1 [–9 to 17] 14 (19.2) 16 [3–43] 14 [4–45] −1 [–6 to 15] 29 (39.7) 21 [3–41] 20 [4–50] 0 [–15 to 17]
CT 43 (58.9) 25 [8–160] 25 [4–200] 0 [–40 to 22] 14 (19.2) 20 [7–42] 17 [4–50] 0.3 [–23 to 22] 33 (45.2) 25 [9–160] 25 [4–200] 0 [–40 to 20]
EUS 29 (39.7) 20 [6–67] 21 [4–90] −1 [–23 to 8] 10 (13.7) 19 [5–29] 16 [5–33] 0.8 [–5 to 6] 22 (30.1) 17 [5–67] 22 [4–90] −1 [–23 to 8]

All values are given as median [range]. The differences were calculated by subtracting the pathological size from the radiological size. CT, computed tomography; EUS, endoscopic ultrasonography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; N, number of; pNET, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.