Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 16;12:627437. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.627437

TABLE 1.

Comparative table on the main aspects of Nash et al. (2018) and this study.

Study aspects Nash et al., 2018 This study
Metagenomic soil samples Number of samples 70 65
Studied proglacial systems Midtre Lovénbreen, Storglaciären, and Rabots glacier forefields; and the proglacial field of the Greenland ice sheet in proximity of point 601 Midtre Lovénbreen and Storglaciären forefields; and the proglacial field of the Greenland ice sheet in proximity of point 601 (i.e., same samples as collected, and sequenced from Nash et al., 2018)
Geochemistry Analyzed variables TOC and TN TOC and TN (data from Nash et al., 2018)
Bioinformatics Read assembly SPADES on each forefield dataset separately MEGAHIT on all forefield datasets together
Gene and taxon annotation BLAST + MEGAN Diamond + LongMeta
Study aims Taxon and functional association with soil developmental stages No Yes
Functional characterization nif genes Functional trends along different developmental soil stages with a focus on genes involved in nitrogen fixation (i.e., nif genes) and rock weathering phenomena (i.e., obcA genes, genes involved in cyanide and siderophore synthesis)
Taxon characterization Diazotrophs present in the different proglacial systems Taxonomic trends along different developmental soil stages

TN, total nitrogen; TOC, total organic carbon.