. 2021;7(4):287–294.

Table 3.

Multivariable linear regression with and without propensity-score matching for AVM volume.

	V4Gy[cc]	V12Gy[cc]
	Beta, (95% CI), p-value	Beta, (95% CI), p-value
Propensity Matched Model (N=28)	R² = 0.93	R² = 0.97
AVM Volume	12.49, (11.07, 13.92), <0.0001	1.69, (1.57, 1.82), <0.0001
Cone treatments (versus MLC)	1.03, (-6.58, 8.65), 0.78	-0.94, (-1.62, 0.27), 0.008
Clinical Model Without Matching (N=63)	R² = 0.83	R² = 0.89
AVM Volume	10.99, (9.56, 12.27), <0.0001	1.47, (1.33, 1.62), <0.0001
Cone treatments (versus MLC)	−12.16, (-33.63, 9.32), 0.26	−2.92, (-5.24, -0.60), 0.01