Table 2.
Clinical Sensitivity of Borrelia burgdorferi Cell-free DNA Detection Combined with Acute-Phase 2-Tiered Serologic Testing in Patients With a Clinical Diagnosis of Erythema Migrans
No. (%) Positive | |||
---|---|---|---|
Patients | B.b. cfDNA or CTTTa | B.b. cfDNA or MTTT Algorithm 1b | B.b. cfDNA or MTTT Algorithm 2c |
All patients with suspected EM (N = 40) | 24 (60) | 28 (70) | 28 (70) |
Laboratory confirmed (n = 28) | 22 (79) | 24 (86) | 24 (86) |
Unconfirmed (n = 12d) | 2 (17) | 4 (33) | 4 (33) |
Abbreviations: B.b., Borrelia burgdorferi; cfDNA, cell-free DNA; CTTT, conventional 2-tiered testing; EM, erythema migrans; MTTT, modified 2-tiered testing.
aSeropositivity by CTTT required a positive or equivocal whole-cell sonicate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Zeus B. burgdorferi immunoglobulin G [IgG]/ immunoglobulin M [IgM] ELISA) and a positive IgM or IgG immunoblot (ViraStripe, Viramed AG). If only the IgM immunoblot was positive, the individual was considered CTTT seropositive only if symptoms were present for <1 month.
bSeropositivity by MTTT algorithm 1 required a positive or equivocal result in both the Zeus B. burgdorferi IgG/IgM ELISA and the Immunetics/Oxford C6 Lyme ELISA.
cSeropositivity by MTTT algorithm 2 required a positive or equivocal result in both the Zeus VlsE/pepC10 IgG/IgM ELISA and the Zeus B. burgdorferi IgG/IgM ELISA.
dTwo skin cultures were contaminated with skin flora and were discontinued before the complete incubation period.