Table 3.
Program Director Perceptions of Residency Application During the COVID-19 Pandemic
| If you were to host interviews in a traditional year, what would you most prefer? | |
| Traditional in-person interviews | 82.8% |
| Virtual interviews | 10.3% |
| Centralized location for all interviews | 3.4% |
| Regional interviews | 0.0% |
| No preference | 3.4% |
| How much did the following experiences during virtual interviews affect your rank list?a | |
| Preinterview/postinterview social/“dinner” | 2.14 ± 1.25 |
| Faculty interviews | 4.38 ± 0.86 |
| Resident interviews | 4.10 ± 1.11 |
| Directly contacting student's letter writers/home programs | 2.25 ± 1.29 |
| Do you agree that the following experiences can be effectively replicated in a virtual interview?a | |
| Preinterview/postinterview social/“dinner” | 2.41 ± 1.27 |
| Faculty interviews | 3.24 ± 0.99 |
| Resident interviews | 3.34 ± 0.94 |
| Facility tours | 3.00 ± 1.25 |
| Informational talks | 2.79 ± 1.35 |
| Understanding applicant “fit” to program | 2.90 ± 1.14 |
| Did receiving a letter of intent (a letter from an applicant stating they have placed you first on their rank list) affect your ranking of the applicant? | |
| Yes, affected ranking positively | 6.9% |
| No, did not affect ranking | 93.1% |
| Yes, affected ranking negatively | 0.0% |
Respondents reported the data for this section categorically (from no effect = 1 to very large effect = 5). These responses were converted to numerical scores and presented as weighted averages.