Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 12;23(7):704–717. doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00707-9

Extended Data Fig. 1. HSC isolation after chemotherapy.

Extended Data Fig. 1

a, Schematic of the experimental strategy followed for the RNA-seq and ATAC-seq experiments on WT HSCs. b, Gating strategies for sorting HSCs from the BM of D0 or 5-FU-injected (H2, H6, H16, D3, D10) mice (15 biologically independent samples- representative plots are shown). c, Comparison of our sorting strategy (LSK/SLAM) to the HSCs sorted using EPCR/SLAM (EPCR+CD48CD1450+) markers. The EPCR/SLAM HSCs are then projected on the LSK/SLAM gating strategy (red color) and the percentage of EPCR/SLAM HSCs that are included in the LSK/SLAM gate is indicated (2 biologically independent samples- representative plots are shown). d, Comparison of the number of cells in the LSK/SLAM gate that are not EPCR/SLAM at D0 and H16 (2 biologically independent samples- representative plots are shown). e, Gene ontology analysis of the genes upregulated at H2, H16 and D10 after 5-FU injection compared to D0 in WT HSCs. X-axis depicts -logP. f, Venn diagrams depicting the overlap of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in WT HSCs with genes assigned to newly accessible regions-gained ATAC peaks at the indicated time points compared to D0 (-100/+25 kb from TSS, p-values represent hypergeometric test). g, Gene ontology analysis of deregulated genes that also exhibit changes in chromatin accessibility at the indicated time points. X-axis depicts -logP.