Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2021 May 3;116(11):3029–3043. doi: 10.1111/add.15506

Table 7.

Latent WM Updating Means Across Groups and Testing Occasions

Alcohol Effects Model (N = 231) No Alcohol
(n = 146)
Alcohol
(n = 85)
WM Updating M SE p M SE p
Baseline .00 .00 --- .00 .01 .634
Ascending limb .05 .01 <.001 .01 .01 .560
Descending limb .08 .01 <.001 .05 .01 <.001
Expectancy Effects Model (N = 231) No Expectancy
(n = 75)
Expectancy
(n = 156)
WM Updating M SE p M SE p
Baseline .00 .00 --- .00 .01 .705
Ascending limb .05 .01 <.001 .03 .01 .010
Descending limb .08 .01 <.001 .07 .01 <.001
Pure Expectancy Effects Model (N = 146) No Expectancy
(n = 75)
Expectancy
(n = 71)
WM Updating M SE p M SE p
Baseline .00 .00 --- .00 .01 1.00
Ascending limb .05 .01 <.001 .05 .01 <.001
Descending limb .08 .01 <.001 .09 .02 <.001

Note. All means were estimated from models under strict measurement invariance constraints. P values indicate the significance of change from the reference level, which was Baseline WM Updating in group No Alcohol or No Expectancy, depending on the model.