Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Aug 24;30(11):1471–1485. doi: 10.1002/pds.5338

Table 2.

Percentage (%) of subjects with the same overlap status (either trimmed or retained) based on estimated propensity scores obtained from various types of models.

Logistic BART GBM Super
Learner
Crump et al.'s recommendation to exclude those with PS outside [.1, .9] Logistic 100.0
BART 82.4 100.0
GBM 81.0 81.0 100.0
Super Learner 83.3 99.1 81.9 100.0
Stürmer et al.’s trimming at the lower and upper 5th percentiles Logistic 100.0
BART 96.3 100.0
GBM 93.0 95.8 100.0
Super Learner 100.0 92.6 90.3 100.0
Nethery et al.'s definition of the region of overlap with u = .1, v = 7 Logistic 100.0
BART 72.2 100.0
GBM 61.1 41.7 100.0
Super Learner 73.1 61.1 73.1 100.0