Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 5;22:852. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04730-7

Table 3.

Intra- and post-operative data for the 10 patients with PAONK. Summary of continuous variables is shown as “mean (standard deviation)”

Patient No Age Sex Type of MM tear Surgery Done Resected width of MM Postop. period until the pain recurrence a Postop. period until taking the MRIb
1. 70’s, F RT at PH (with HT) PMM Subtotal 8 wks 12 wks
2. 60’s, M RT at PH PMM Half 12 wks 19 wks
3. 60’s, F PRT PMM Subtotal 2 wks 4 wks
4. 70’s, F PRT (with HT) PMM Subtotal 4 wks 6 wks
5. 60’s, F PRT (with HT) PMM Subtotal 8 wks 9 wks
6. 60’s, F PRT PMM, PLM Subtotal 6 wks 11 wks
7. 60’s, F RT at PH PMM Half 7 wks 21 wks
8. 80’s, M RT at PH (with HT) PMM Subtotal 7 wks 19 wks
9. 60’s, F PRT PMM, PLM Subtotal 3 wks 5 wks
10. 60’s, F RT at PH (with HT) PMM, LMR Subtotal Unclear 3 wks
 Summary PRT: 5 PMM: 10 Subtotal: 8 5.7 wks 12.1 wks
RT: 5 PLM: 2 LMR: 1 Half: 2 (3.3) (7.9)

F Female, M Male, MM Medial meniscus, RT Radial tear, PH Posterior horn, HT Horizontal tear, PRT Posterior root tear, PMM Partial medial meniscectomy, PLM Partial lateral meniscectomy, LMR Lateral meniscus repair. a The period from the meniscectomy to the recurrence of knee pain. b The period from the meniscectomy to the time of diagnosis of PAONK using MRI