Table 2.
Key data input metrics for Brazilian finishing cattle operations
| Mato Grosso | Mato Grosso do Sul | Goiás | São Paulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data input | Finishing farm | Finishing farm | Bull feedlot | Heifer feedlot |
| Mortality rate, % | 1.4 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Age at slaughter, mo | 36.0 | 36.0 | 27.3 | 26 |
| Weight at slaughter, kg | 550 | 509 | 525 | 487 |
| Dressing percentage, % | 53.0 | 53.0 | 56.0 | 52.0 |
| Stocking rate, head/ha | 0.95 | 0.95 | – | – |
| Diet ingredients | Pasture, urea, corn, minerals | Pasture, urea, corn, minerals | Corn silage, corn, soybean meal, cottonseed meal, limestone, urea | Sugarcane silage, corn silage, corn, cottonseed meal, citrus pulp, urea |
| Manure management | Spread on fields | Spread on fields | Spread on fields/lagoon storage | Spread on fields/lagoon storage |
| Transport distance to finishing farm or feedlot, km | 150 | 200 | 200 | 584 |
| Truck capacity, head | 40 | 40 | 42 | 42 |
| Transport distance to slaughterhouse, km | 30 | 80 | 20 | 135 |
| Truck capacity, head | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 |
| Truck fuel efficiency (km/L) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Transport distance for bought-in feed, km | 300 | 250 | 25 | 500 |
| Transport distance for bought-in fertilizer, km | 300 | 180 | 25 | 500 |