Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 6;81(10):1128–1144. doi: 10.1055/a-1475-4335

Table 2  Phase III trials on the combined treatment with immune checkpoint blockade and chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer.

Trial NCT02718417 (JAVELIN Ovarian 100) NCT03038100 (IMagyn050) NCT02580058 (JAVELIN Ovarian 200)
* did not meet predefined level of significance
Abbreviations: ECOG PS = Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group Performance Status, ICB = immune checkpoint blockade, ICH = immunohistochemistry, HR = hazard ratio, OS = overall survival, PD-L1 = programmed cell death ligand 1, PLD = pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, PFS = progression-free survival
Immune checkpoint inhibitor used Avelumab Atezolizumab Avelumab
Targeted ICB structure PD-L1 PD-L1 PD-L1
Arms A) 6 × carboplatin/paclitaxel → avelumab for 24 months
B) 6 × carboplatin/paclitaxel/avelumab → avelumab for 24 months
C) 6 × carboplatin/paclitaxel
A) 6 × carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab + placebo → maintenance with bevacizumab and placebo
B) 6 × carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab + atezolizumab → maintenance with bevacizumab and atezolizumab
A) Avelumab
B) Avelumab + PLD
C) PLD
Study design Multicentre, randomised (1 : 1 : 1), open Multicentre, randomised (1 : 1), double-blind Multicentre, randomised (1 : 1 : 1), open
Primary endpoint(s) PFS PFS PFS, OS
No. of patients (n) 998 1301 566
Population First-line therapy
FIGO III – IV, ECOG PS 0 – 1, after debulking or as neoadjuvant therapy
(31.6% surgery without macroscopic residual tumour)
First-line therapy
FIGO III – IV, ECOG PS 0 – 2, after debulking (75%) or as neoadjuvant therapy/interval debulking (25%)
(7.4% surgery without macroscopic residual tumour)
Platinum-resistant/refractory recurrence
≤ 3 prior therapies
no prior therapy in Pt-resistant recurrence
Histology 76% high-grade serous
6.2% low-grade serous
5.5% clear cell
3.2% endometrioid
8.7% other
76% high-grade serous
10% low-grade serous
12% high-grade non-serous
4% clear cell
69% high-grade serous
4% low-grade serous
13% clear cell
3% endometrioid
10% other
Definition “PD-L1 positive” ≥ 1% tumour cells positive and/or ≥ 5% immune cells positive
(Ventana SP263 IHC assay)
≥ 1% immune cells positive
(Ventana SP142 IHC assay)
≥ 1% tumour cells positive and/or ≥ 5% immune cells positive
(Ventana SP263 IHC assay)
PD-L1 status 48.8% PD-L1 positive
32.6% PD PD-L1 negative
40% PD-L1 positive
60% PD PD-L1 negative
57% PD-L1 positive
Median PFS A) 16.8 months (HR 1.43 vs. C, p = 0.989)
B) 18.1 months (HR 1.14 vs. C, p = 0.794)
C) Median not reached
A) 18.4 months
B) 19.5 months (HR 0.92, p = 0.28)
A) 1.9 months (HR 1.68 vs. C,> 0.999)
B) 3.7 months (HR 0.78 vs. C, p = 0.030*)
C) 3.5 months
Overall survival (OS) No difference in OS to date No difference in OS to date A) 11.8 months (HR 1.14 vs. C, p = 0.8)
B) 15.7 months (HR 0.89 vs. C, p = 0.21)
C) 13.1 months
Median PFS (PD-L1 positive) A) Median not met (HR 1.23 vs. C, p = 0.357)
B) Median not met (HR 0.98 vs. C, p = 0.918)
C) Median not met
A) 18.5 months
B) 20.8 months (HR 0.80, p = 0.038*)
A) 1.9 months (HR 1.45 vs. C, p = 0.030)
B) 3.7 months (HR 0.65 vs. C, p = 0.0149)
C) 3.0 months
Median PFS (PD-L1 negative) A) 16.8 months (HR 1.02 vs. C, p = 0.950)
B) 13.9 months (HR 1.36 vs. C, p = 0.232)
C) Median not met
References Ledermann et al. 133 Moore et al. 5 Pujade-Lauraine et al. 135