Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 6;11:19816. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98851-7

Table 11.

The comparison between the models.

Authors Model Solution Optimal function Results
Rashid et al. (2020) Hybridized WOAGWO with Solution Approach Solving critical probability in pressure vessel design in hospital Statistical test compute for unimodal and multimodal functions Shows that WOAGWO outperforms other algorithms depending on the test
Oliva et al. (2020) Mixed integer linear programming (MILP), two binary variants of WOA Minimized cost feature and total waiting time A particle swarm optimizer and a mixed statistical test called Achieved the smallest number of selected features with the best classification accuracy in a minimum time
Tahir et al. (2020) Implementing two stages, binary chaotic (BCGA) and WOA Two stages fitness function and BCGA feature given significant classification accuracy Evolutionary computing-based optimized patient’s waiting time BCGA map perform better and find a robust subset as compared to other maps in enhancing the performance of raw WOA
The presented method Inter Linear Programming and WOA technique Resolves appointment scheduling and waiting time problems for effective FCFS policy and obtained patients satisfaction Numerical results indicate that both the FCFS and WOA approaches are strategy optimized Both the FCFS and the WOA strategies data to gain the most propriety (Fairness) results and patient satisfaction