Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 6;11:19872. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97726-1

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of dIMMI and CDMMI models. The dIMMI model has statistically superior performance in accurately modelling the photoacoustic imaging process for low image resolutions (a, b) under both the L1 and L2 norms. At high resolutions, CDMMI trended towards superior performance over dIMMI, though does not consistently achieve statistical separation. (c) Both dIMMI and CDMMI have improved SSIM scores as a function of pixel resolution; CDMMI achieves slightly better performance at high resolutions. Figure created using a combination of MATLAB and Microsoft PowerPoint.