DNMT3A |
-
-
present in approximately 15% of MDS patients [8,16]
-
-
occur very early in disease evolution, most frequently as hotspot mutations in the R882 codon [8,16]
|
|
TET2 |
|
-
-
associated with increased response to hypomethylating agents, especially when present at high VAFs [42]
-
-
associated with shorter overall survival after HSCT [56]
|
ASXL1 |
-
-
present in 10% − 20% of MDS patients [3,8]
-
-
associated with thrombocytopenia, increased bone marrow blasts, trisomy 8, intermediate-risk karyotype and mutations of RUNX1, EZH2, IDH1, IDH2, NRAS, JAK2, SETBP1, and SRSF2 [16,68]
|
-
-
predict inferior outcome in MDS and CMML patients [16,68,69], including a shorter overall survival following HSCT [2]
|
Spliceosome gene mutations |
-
-
present in approximately 50% of MDS patients [8]
-
-
often represent early events with high VAFs at presentation [7,8]
|
|
SF3B1 |
-
-
among the most frequently mutated genes in MDS (25% − 35% of patients) [3,8]
-
-
strong correlation with ring sideroblast phenotype and ineffective erythropoiesis
-
-
may be seen as a distinct nosologic entity [28]
|
|
IDH1 and IDH2
|
|
-
-
prognostic impact in MDS are still up to debate, IDH1 mutations may have an adverse prognostic effect [71]
-
-
promising data from early clinical trials for IDH inhibitors enasidenib and ivosidenib [72]
|
RUNX1 |
|
-
-
implied in disease progression and frequently found in secondary AML evolving from MDS [73]
-
-
associated with shorter survival following HSCT[2]
-
-
may lead to unresponsiveness to lenalidomide in del(5q) MDS [38]
|
NRAS, KRAS |
-
-
present in approximately 10% of MDS patients [3,8]
-
-
late, mostly subclonal events [32,33]
-
-
a cooperation between genes involved in the cohesin and RAS pathways was observed in 15% − 20% of MDS patients who evolved to secondary AML [32]
|
|
TP53 |
-
-
present in 5% − 10% of MDS patients [3,8]
-
-
associate with reduced hemoglobin and platelet counts at MDS presentation [9]
-
-
closely linked to complex karyotypes
|
- provide a survival advantage during radio-chemotherapy and are enriched in individuals with therapy related MDS [13,14]
- associate with dismal outcomes regardless of the applied therapy (HMA, allogeneic HSCT)[42,56]
- adverse prognosis may depend on the mutation burden, allelic state and genomic context [74]
- response to decitabine comparable to that of intermediate risk MDS patients [45]
- loss of a mutation associates with improved outcome during disease course [65]
- promising data from early clinical trials for
- TP53 reactivator APR-246 in combination with azacitidine [75]
- inhibitor of mitochondrial metabolism CPI-613 (Devimistat)
- CD47 antibody Magrolimab
|
PPM1D |
-
-
present in <5% of MDS patients [3,8]
-
-
provide a survival advantage during radio-chemotherapy and are enriched in individuals with therapy related MDS [29,55]
|
|
NPM1 |
|
-
-
associated with an aggressive MDS phenotype and a high progression risk to AML [8,46], should be treated as AML whenever possible
-
-
similar to AML, appear to be stable during disease course [8,46]
-
-
intensive chemotherapy and HSCT seem to improve outcomes [46]
-
-
high activity of combination therapies of venetoclax and HMA in NPM1-mutated AML as well as in higher risk MDS [47] hint to a similarly high potential in MDS harboring NPM1 mutations
|