Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 16;19:5381–5391. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.09.016

Table 1.

Performance of the final regressor on a non-redundant blind test set. The model was trained including both forward and hypothetical reverse mutations, and tested on a non-redundant blind test set. The performances of other methods are also shown for comparison purposes.

Name Method Pearson Spearman Kendall RMSE (Kcal/mol)
SUSPECT-ABL Machine Learning 0.74 0.57 0.42 0.40
mCSM-lig [49] Machine Learning 0.43 0.33 0.24 0.75
Aldeghi et al.[11] Machine Learning 0.06 0.21 0.15 0.64
Hauser et al.[9] Molecular Dynamics 0.65 0.38 0.30 0.69
A99 [11] Molecular Dynamics 0.40 0.26 0.17 0.68
A99L Molecular Dynamics 0.60 0.37 0.26 0.55
A99DC Molecular Dynamics 0.58 0.45 0.31 0.55
A14 Molecular Dynamics 0.37 0.37 0.26 0.70
R15[11] Rosetta 0.72 0.50 0.38 0.49
R16 Rosetta 0.47 0.29 0.20 0.70