Table 2.

Analysis of the methodological quality of the articles selected for this systematic review

	Styles, et al.12	Otero-Esquina et al.13	Loturco et al.20	Saez De Villaroel et al.21	Asadi et al. 14	Hammami et al.15
Randomization sequence generation	No report	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
Allocation Secrecy	No report	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
Adhesion of the endorsed	No report	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
Attachment of the professionals who applied the intervention	No report	No report	Yes	Yes	Yes	No report
Blindness of the assessors of the waste	No report	No report	Yes	No report	No report	No report
Similar groups in the initial evaluation	No report	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
Criteria for selection of participants	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Analysis by intention to treat	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Static comparison between groups	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Description of losses and exclusions	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report
PEDro scale scoring	3	3	9	8	4	7