Skip to main content
European Journal of Translational Myology logoLink to European Journal of Translational Myology
. 2021 Aug 31;31(3):9877. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2021.9877

Taopatch® combined with home-based training protocol to prevent sedentary lifestyle and biochemical changes in MS patients during COVID-19 pandemic

Alessandra Amato 1,#, Giuseppe Messina 1,#,, Kaltrina Feka 1, Diego Genua 1, Paolo Ragonese 2, Dorota Kostrzewa-Nowak 3,4, Francesco Fischetti 5, Angelo Iovane 1, Patrizia Proia 1
PMCID: PMC8495370  PMID: 34498450

Abstract

In Multiple sclerosis (MS) it is important to preserve the residual physiological functions of subjects. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of nanotechnological device treatment combined with home-based training program (TP) on lactate level, hand grip strength and cervical mobility on MS patients. Seventeen MS patients were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to an experimental group (EG) in which the Taopatch® nanotechnological device was applied or to a control group (CG). All the participants carried out a cervical range of motion (1) assessment and the hand grip test at baseline (T0) and after TP (T1), also investigating the lactate levels to figure out if there could be a correlation with the possible changes in the investigated parameters. The results showed no significant differences in both groups for ROM. As regards the hand grip test, EG showed a statistically significant improvement on strength for both hands, dominant (p = 0.01) and non-dominant (p = 0.04), while the CG showed an improvement only for the non-dominant hand (p = 0.001). No correlation was found between baseline lactate level and cervical ROM change. We can definitely conclude that exercise and Taopatch® can help to improve and maintain hand strength in MS subjects and also can prevent sedentary lifestyle during the COVID-19 pandemic time. These are preliminary results that need further investigations, possibly increasing sample size and lengthening time of intervention.

Key Words: Home-based training program, cervical range of motion, lactate, nanotechnology-based device, hand grip test, Taopatch®, light therapy

Ethical Publication Statement

We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disabling disease of the central nervous system (CNS) of unknown aetiology.1 In this disease the CNS is affected by an immune-mediated inflammatory disease followed by a demyelination with consequent axonal damage.2 This disabling state affects the musculoskeletal system impairing physical characteristics.3 In fact, among the symptoms that MS patients experience, there are fatigue, weakness, impaired mobility, with related physical functioning scores which affect the quality of life.4 It has been demonstrated that specific physical training protocol, such us proprioceptive training, can improve the quality of life in these subjects through the improvement of some impaired abilities.5 However, these protocols alone seem to have no prolonged effects over time to improve balance, range of motion or postural control in these subjects.1 For this reason, myofascial release (MFR) has been proposed as a method that improves the range of motion and the quality of movements.6 However, there are obvious limitations for MFR being an operator sensitive technique. Alternatively, it emerged the possibility to use a very similar but simpler technique, the self-myofascial release (SMFR), which can be self-applied individually.7

Furthermore, change in lactate concentration are related to various physiological and pathological conditions such as MS in which is already known that there is an increase of lactate levels.8 In general, in research experience the influence of several biomechanical devices, as occlusal splints and foot orthoses, on many physical features have been investigated reporting conflicting results.9-12 Although the use of nanotechnological devices is growing in different healthcare application, only a few research groups have studied the role of a nanotechnological device on physical features.13 A medical device, recently developed, that uses nanotechnology is the Taopatch® (Tao Technologies, Italy). This device acts through light therapy thanks to the use of quantum dots. These quantum dots are nanocrystals excited with the heat and the sunlight that will be transformed into near-far infrared and ultraviolet light that can have beneficial effects on the human body.13 Taopatch® appears as a circular microchip, with 16 mm diameter and less than 1 mm thick. The device is applied to the skin with the aid of tape. The coating is in hypoallergenic plastic material with inside a mixture of nanotechnology, the main components are nanocrystals called quantum dots, of the upconverting nanocrystals.

In a recent study, Carbonari et al have highlighted changes in strength and body balance using this nanotechnological device by detecting athlete’s performance. In fact, Taopatch® device has improved strength and balance performance increasing the maximum tension of the affected muscles; the electromyography was used to detect changes in the activity of the postural muscles.13 Lomeo et al. (2019),9 investigated the effect of Taopatch® in subjects with MS and showed that the use of these devices can improve and prolong the effect on proprioception, balance, mouvements of the affected limbs and this can be extremely helpful for these patients. They also observed (SF-36 Questionnaire) an improvement in physical and emotional conditions of the patients.9 In addition, nanotechnology has been shown to be useful for several purposes including performance and posture improvements and injury recovery.13 It is now known that exercise improves physical health but also the quality of life and this need is accentuated in this period of forced sedentary lifestyle due to the pandemic situation,14,15 and especially in subjects with various pathologies, physical activity can be the key factor to improve quality of life; in particular, individuals with MS have a tendency to be sedentary due to the difficulty of following a rehabilitation program in hospitals or authorized centers.16 This is due to fatigue due to illness, drug treatment as well as depression and social isolation also due to the consequences of the pandemic caused by COVID-19. The aim of our study was to evaluate if Taopatch®, combined with a home-based protocol of proprioceptive and joint mobility training together with a SMFR treatment, can induce a change in biochemical biomarkers like lactate as well as strength and cervical ROM in MS patients.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Seventeen subjects (age: 51,24±10,66; height: 170,65±10,42; weight: 76,47± 12,30) with relapsing-remitting MS (RR-MS) with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) between 3.5-5.5 were enrolled in the study by physical medicine and rehabilitation center “Vitality” from Vita, Sicily, Italy. Subjects were randomly assigned to the Experimental Group (EG; n=9) or Control Group (CG; n = 8) who performed a Training Program (TP) with (EG) or without (CG) Taopatch®.

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of The Palermo 1, decree N 7/2016 Policlinico Giaccone Hospital, Palermo, Italy. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants of the study. An anamnestic examination was carried out by specialized medical personnel before starting the study.

Assessments

Participants of both groups performed a cervical ROM and a hand grip test at baseline (T0) and after a training program period (T1). In addition, lactate level was evaluated in all participants at baseline (Accutrend® Plus, Roche). Cervical ROM was measured with an accelerometer (Moover®; Sensor Medica®; Guidonia Montecelio, Roma, Italia) placed in the center of the forehead with a band. Subjects performed a left (L) and right (R) rotation; inclination (L and R) and a flexion and an extension of the cervical segment. Each movement was performed starting from an upright position with the head in line with the body. Handgrip test (KERN MAP Version 1.2 08/2012, Hand Grip Dynamometer) was performed three time each side and the best result of L and R hand was considered to data analysis.

Training Program

The TP was composed of 20 sessions of 1 hour carried out twice a week, it included proprioceptive and joint mobility exercises and a self-myofascial release treatment, in particular they performed:

  • About 5 minutes of circuit gait training on the platform (forward, backward, sideways, on toes with eyes open and eyes closed) and go up and down three steps.

  • 3 exercises (2 minutes each exercise) of pelvic mobilization and breathing sitting on the fit ball: hip bone anteversion; hip bone retroversion; hip bone rotation and lateralization.

  • 20 minutes of stationary bicycle Fitness minibike (Roten bi-bike), an automatic system for leg, miming a bicycle, which allows passive, active or assisted mobilization for patients with MS.

  • As concerns proprioceptive handgrip exercise, the patients performed about 15 minutes of the protocol described in Liu et al., 2018.17 In summary the subjects performed 25 repetitions of the grip exercise with both hands (alternating the side) using an elastic ball; each repetition consisted in squeezing the elastic ball for 10 seconds, then relax for 10 seconds.

  • 15 minutes of SMFR treatment following the protocol described from Amato et al.18

Fig 1.

Fig 1.

Taopatch® device applied on C7 and on xiphoid process. The devices were applied before to start the training period, for ten weeks 24 hours a day.

During each training session, a nanotechnological device (Taopatch®; Tao Technologies srl) was applied only to EG, as showed in Figure 1, positioned in two different points: below C7 posteriorly and on the xiphoid process anteriorly. The devices were applied before starting the training period (ten weeks, 24 hours a day).

Statistical analysis

The Kolgomorov–Smirnov test was used to check for normal distribution. Student t-tests were used to compare the baseline characteristics of the two groups. Changes between baseline and T1 within the groups were analyzed by paired t-test. Within‐group changes were calculated as percentage changes. Unpaired t-test were used to compare these differences in the two groups. The correlations between handgrip test and lactate level were statistically evaluated using Pearson correlation (PC) tests. All tests were two‐tailed, and a 5% probability level was considered significant. We used SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 23) for statistical analysis.

Results

The Kolgomorov–Smirnov test shows that all data are normally distributed. Table 1 describes the values of the variables assessed at T0 for CG and EG. The unpaired T-Test highlighted that only for handgrip test there were significant differences between groups at baseline. R hand (Kg): 19.10 ± 8,53 (EG); 29.51 ±7.21 (CG), p<0.05; L hand (Kg): 18.91± 9.20 (EG); 29.17 ± 6.62 (CG), p<0.05. No significant differences between groups were detected at T0 for all the other parameters investigated (p>0,05). After training program intervention there were no significant differences between T0 and T1 in both groups in cervical ROM evaluations. Regarding strength assessment, hand grip test showed a change between T0 and T1 in both groups; in detail as regard the experimental group there were an increase of 10.70% in left hand (T0 18.91 ± 9.20 vs T1 20.93± 8.80; p< 0,05) and of 14.08% in right hand (T0 19.10 ± 8.53 vs T1 21.79 ± 8.80; p< 0.05). Figure 2 shows that in control group instead there was an increase of 18 % only in left hand (T0 29.18 ± 6,62 vs T1 34.51 ± 6.68; p <0.05). Starting from the lactate level baseline (CG 1.36 ± 0.37 vs EG 1.44 ± 0.53), no correlation was found between handgrip evaluations and lactate level. Table 2 shows the Pearson’s correlation coefficients for each variable.

Table 1.

Anthropometric, cervical ROM and strength variables at baseline for control and experimental group.

Variables Control Group (n=8) Experimental Group (n=9)
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Age 44,75± 7,91 50,89±12,04
Height 166,22±11,63 175,63±6,32
Weight 74±12,23 79,25±12,59
ROT L (°) 69,66±5,87 66,16±13,31
ROT R (°) 67,12±9,34 59,86±16,28
ROTtot (°) 136,80±12,89 126±28,92
INC L (°) 41,38±12,80 35,08±9,52
INC R (°) 36,90±6,98 33,33±13,21
INCtot (°) 78,30±17,83 68,42±20,85
Flex (°) 54,40±11,58 49,31±14,06
Extn (°) 57,70±15,23 54,30±16,66
Flex-extn (°) 112,09±20,90 103,61±28,56
Handgrip R (kg) 29,51±7,21 19,10#±8,53
Handgrip L (kg) 29,17±6,62 18,91#±9,20

Flex: flexion; Extn: extension; R: right; L: left; ROT: rotation; INC: inclination. # Significance between-group (p<0.05). SD Standard Deviation

Fig 2.

Fig 2.

Baseline (T0) and post exercise program period (T1) values of strength variables of control (CG) and experimental (EG). R: right; L: left; *Significant within‐group difference between T0 and T1 (p<0.05).

Table 2.

Pearson correlation coefficients (PC) and significances (S) are shown in the table between handgrip test and basal lactate levels.

Lactate Baseline
Handgrip test T0 Handgrip test T1
PC S PC S
Control Group
Handgrip R -0,59 0,12 -0,47 0,24
Handgrip L -0,033 0,94 -0,02 0,97
Experimental Group
Handgrip R -0,13 0,75 -0,16 0,69
Handgrip L -0,46 0,21 -0,43 0,25

Discussion

The aetiology of Multiple Sclerosis is still unknown. Many factors play a role in the onset of the pathology, that also change gait and balance abilities.19 Certainly, exercise can help to manage MS symptoms, to prevent some complications, to increase strength, mobility, static and dynamic balance and consequently improving quality of life.5 However, to date, all medical, surgical and physical rehabilitation therapies have not shown lasting benefits over time. Taopatch® abilities to improve movement, posture and balance have been demonstrated,13,20 the ultra-low-level electromagnetic field generated by the nanotechnology-based devices may provide an improvement to the input system or central modulation resulting in an improved muscle tone and, thus, an enhanced posture control.21 It has recently been shown that also in subjects with MS, these devices can induce improvement on proprioception, ROM and balance.9 For these reasons we hypothesized that the use of this device combined with physical activity performed at home could have effects on functional impairments in MS patients. We enrolled in our study 17 MS patients split in 2 groups that both performed PA but just one, the experimental group, wore the Taopatch® devices. The results obtained didn’t highlighted any statistically significant changes in all cervical ROM variables analyzed (p > 0.05)

Considering that other symptoms like muscle weakness can occur especially in asymmetrically way in persons with MS, hence a difference between both hands can be expected. It has been assumed that non-dominant arm is likely to be more impaired than the dominant arm, because of reduced use in daily life, given decreased functionality,22 and not for the features of the disease (because the fatigue in MS patients have a central origin).23 In fact, Severijns et al in their study showed that hand grip strength in people with multiple sclerosis is not influenced by hand dominance.24 Therefore, the aim of our study was to understand if the association between TP and Taopatch® can reduce the progression of muscle weakness through the improvement of the upper limb strength. In this way this should contribute to improve the quality of life of the patients by maintaining autonomy and facilitating some of the daily actions. Our results showed in the handgrip test a statistically significant increase in the experimental group, in both hands: for right hand 14.08% of increase (p=0.01) with a gain of 2.69 Kg and for left hand 10,70% of increase (p=0.04) with a gain of 2.02 Kg. It’s already published a change of 5.5 kg in handgrip score reliably indicate a true change in functional abilities that are the actual or potential capacities of an individual to perform the activities and tasks that can be normally expected.25 Indeed, this provides hints for future investigations and since hand strength is frequently impaired in individuals with MS, further studies are warranted to establish using the hand grip as a clinical test and to monitor important change in disease.22,24,26-28 In the future it will be interesting to associate the result of handgrip test with a questionnaire measuring patient-perceived difficulties in performing manual activities of daily living such as the ABILHAND questionnaire, validated in patients with MS.29 In this way, we could investigate the impact of hand function on home and work life and their perception of change in function over time.

In conclusion, association between proprioceptive, joint mobility exercise and SMFR with Taopatch® device can help to improve and to maintain hand strength in MS subjects by delaying the onset of hand dysfunctions and by facilitating manual activities of daily living. It also works to prevent sedentary lifestyle due to COVID-19 pandemic.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank all the participants to study and also physical medicine and rehabilitation center “Vitality” from Vita, Sicily, Italy.

List of acronyms

CG

Control Group

CNS

Central Nervous System

EG

Experimental Group

Extn

Extension

Flex

Flexion

INC

Inclination

L

Left

MS

Multiple sclerosis

PC

Pearson Correlation coefficients

R

Right

ROM

Range of Motion

ROT

Rotation

S

Significances

T0

Baseline

T1

After Training period

TP

Training Program

Funding Statement

Funding: This research was conducted with PosturaLab® Italia funding.

Contributor Information

Alessandra Amato, Email: alessandra.amato02@unipa.it.

Kaltrina Feka, Email: kaltrina.feka92@gmail.com.

Diego Genua, Email: genuaprofdiego@libero.it.

Paolo Ragonese, Email: paolo.ragonese@unipa.it.

Dorota Kostrzewa-Nowak, Email: dorota.kostrzewa-nowak@usz.edu.pl.

Francesco Fischetti, Email: francesco.fischetti@uniba.it.

Angelo Iovane, Email: angelo.iovane@unipa.it.

Patrizia Proia, Email: patrizia.proia@unipa.it.

References

  • 1.Dobson R, Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis - a review. Eur J Neurol. 2019. Jan;26(1):27-40. doi: 10.1111/ene.13819. Epub 2018 Nov 18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Karussis D. The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and the various related demyelinating syndromes: a critical review. J Autoimmun. 2014. Feb-Mar;48-49:134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 Feb 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Owens B. Multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2016. Nov 30;540(7631):S1. doi: 10.1038/540S1a.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gross HJ, Watson C. Characteristics, burden of illness, and physical functioning of patients with relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional US survey. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017. May 18;13:1349-1357. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S132079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Proia P, Amato A, Puleo R, Arnetta F, Rizzo F, Di Grigoli L, Zangla D, Schirò G, Ragonese P, Messina G. Efficacy of 12 Weeks of Proprioceptive Training in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2019; 14(5proc): S1986-S1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kalichman L, Ben David C. Effect of self-myofascial release on myofascial pain, muscle flexibility, and strength: A narrative review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017. Apr;21(2):446-451. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Amato A, Messina G, Giustino V, Brusa J, Brighina F, Proia P. A pilot study on non-invasive treatment of migraine: The self-myofascial release. Eur J Transl Myol. 2021. Mar 26;31(1):9646. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2021.9646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Amorini AM, Nociti V, Petzold A, Gasperini C, Quartuccio E, Lazzarino G, Di Pietro V, Belli A, Signoretti S, Vagnozzi R, Lazzarino G, Tavazzi B. Serum lactate as a novel potential biomarker in multiple sclerosis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014. Jul;1842(7):1137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014. 04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lomeo A, Cacciaguerra G, Garsia D, Scolaro A. Utilisation des dispositifs nanotechnologiques dans les pathologies dégénératives cérébrales. Étude prospective sur 28 patients atteints de sclérose en plaques. Hegel. 2019:2:114, doi:10.4267/2042/70215. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Battaglia G. Influence of Occlusal Vertical Dimension on Cervical Spine Mobility in Sports Subjects. Acta Medica Mediterr. 2016; doi:10.19193/0393-6384_2016_5_135. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Battaglia G, Messina G, Giustino V, Zangla D, Barcellona M, Iovane A, Palma A. Influence of Vertical Dimension of Occlusion on Peak Force During Handgrip Tests in Athletes. Asian J Sports Med. 2018, In Press, doi:10.5812/asjsm.68274. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burke JR, Papuga MO. Effects of foot orthotics on running economy: methodological considerations. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012. May;35(4):327-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Carbonari B, Balducci F, Cesaretti G, Cesanelli L, Botticelli D, Messina G. Performance, balance and posture variations with Occlusal Splint and Taopatch® devices: a retrospettive cross-over study. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2021. Feb;61(2):317-323. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11053-3. Epub 2020 Jul 30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cataldi S, Francavilla VC, Bonavolontà V, De Florio O, Carvutto R, De Candia M, Latino F, Fischetti F. Proposal for a Fitness Program in the School Setting during the COVID 19 Pandemic: Effects of an 8-Week CrossFit Program on Psychophysical Well-Being in Healthy Adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. Mar 18;18(6):3141. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hebisz P, Hebisz R, Murawska-Ciałowicz E, Zatoń M. Changes in exercise capacity and serum BDNF following long-term sprint interval training in well-trained cyclists. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019. May;44(5):499-506. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0427. Epub 2018 Oct 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim M, Lee M, Kim M, Oh S, Jung S, Yoon B. Effectiveness of therapeutic inflatable ball self-exercises for improving shoulder function and quality of life in breast cancer survivors after sentinel lymph node dissection. Support Care Cancer. 2019. Jul;27(7):2349-2360. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-4656-0. Epub 2019 Mar 12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.L Liu K, Zhou Y, Xie W, Gu Z, Jin Y, Ye X, Chen X, Fan B, Wang H, Cui Y. Handgrip exercise reduces peripherally-inserted central catheter-related venous thrombosis in patients with solid cancers: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018. Oct;86:99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Amato A, Messina G, Giustino V, Brusa J, Brighina F, Proia P. A pilot study on non-invasive treatment of migraine: The self-myofascial release. Eur J Transl Myol. 2021. Mar 26;31(1):9646. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2021.9646. PMID: 33709650; PMCID: PMC8056163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fritz NE, Newsome SD, Eloyan A, Marasigan RE, Calabresi PA, Zackowski KM. Longitudinal relationships among posturography and gait measures in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2015. May 19;84(20):2048-56. doi: 10.1212/WNL. 0000000000001580. Epub 2015 Apr 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Malchiodi Albedi G, Corna S, Aspesi V, Clerici D, Parisio C, Seitanidis J, Cau N, Brugliera L, Capodaglio P. Effects of nanotechnology-based devices on postural control in healthy subjects. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018. Oct;58(10):1418-1422. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07530-2. Epub 2017 Sep 5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen G, Ågren H, Ohulchanskyy TY, Prasad PN. Light upconverting core-shell nanostructures: nanophotonic control for emerging applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2015. Mar 21;44(6):1680-713. doi: 10.1039/c4cs00170b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lamers I, Kerkhofs L, Raats J, Kos D, Van Wijmeersch B, Feys P. Perceived and actual arm performance in multiple sclerosis: relationship with clinical tests according to hand dominance. Mult Scler. 2013. Sep;19(10):1341-8. doi: 10.1177/1352458513475832. Epub 2013 Feb 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gordon NM, Rudroff T, Enoka JA, Enoka RM. Handedness but not dominance influences variability in endurance time for sustained, submaximal contractions. J Neurophysiol. 2012. Sep;108(5):1501-10. doi: 10.1152/jn.01144.2011. Epub 2012 Jun 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Severijns D, Lamers I, Kerkhofs L, Feys P. Hand grip fatigability in persons with multiple sclerosis according to hand dominance and disease progression. J Rehabil Med. 2015. Feb;47(2):154-60. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schwid SR, Goodman AD, McDermott MP, Bever CF, Cook SD. Quantitative functional measures in MS: what is a reliable change? Neurology. 2002. Apr 23;58(8):1294-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.8.1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Iyengar V, Santos MJ, Ko M, Aruin AS. Grip force control in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009. Oct;23(8):855-61. doi: 10.1177/1545968309338194. Epub 2009 Jun 16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Messina G, Amato A, Brighina F, Lo Monaco A, Giustino V, Brusa J, Iovane A, Proia P. Lactate Level and Handgrip Test in Migraine and Fibromyalgia after Self-Myofascial Release Treatment. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2019. 14(5proc), S2019-S2025. doi: 10.14198 /jhse.2019.14.Proc5.23 [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Newsome SD, von Geldern G, Shou H, Baynes M, Marasigan RER, Calabresi PA, Zackowski KM. Longitudinal assessment of hand function in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019. Jul;32:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.04.035. Epub 2019 May 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Barrett LE, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, Hobart JC. Can the ABILHAND handle manual ability in MS? Mult Scler. 2013. May;19(6):806-15. doi: 10.1177/1352458512462919. Epub 2012 Oct 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Journal of Translational Myology are provided here courtesy of PAGEPress

RESOURCES