Table 3.

Correlation Coefficients between the Individual Measurements of Interest and BCVA

	Manual Segmentations					Automatic Segmentations
ROI	P	W	A	%	C	P	W	A	%	C
SI	0.27	0.65	0.49	0.47	0.37	0.36	0.70	0.58	0.58	0.52
WBC infiltration	0.11	0.46	0.51	0.51	0.40	0.28	0.55	0.61	0.60	0.47
Corneal edema	−0.18	$\underset{\_}{-0.14}$	$\underset{\_}{-0.07}$	$\underset{\_}{-0.08}$	$\underset{\_}{-0.13}$	0.14	$\underset{\_}{0.21}$	$\underset{\_}{\mathbf{0}.\mathbf{26}}$	$\underset{\_}{\mathbf{0}.\mathbf{25}}$	$\underset{\_}{0.20}$
Hypopyon	0.55	0.57	0.45	0.46	0.57	0.58	0.58	0.52	0.53	0.59
ED	0.21	0.54	0.44	0.42	0.34	0.31	0.57	0.46	0.44	0.37

Statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05) correlation coefficients are shown in bold.

William's test was used to determine the statistical significance between manual and automatic segmentations. Statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05) differences are underlined. % indicates the proportion of corneal limbus area affected. A, total area; C, centrality; P, presence; W, maximum width.