TABLE 4.
Comparison of cone population densities in control fish and fish with cone regeneration
| all ablated |
R ablated |
UV ablated |
B ablated |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| regen. R | regen. G | regen. UV | regen. B | regen. R | regen. UV | regen. B | ||
| Control | R | 0.004 | 0.004 | |||||
| G | 0.004 | |||||||
| UV | 0.004 | 0.00007 | ||||||
| B | 0.004 | 0.0007 | ||||||
Note: p-values from pair-wise comparisons of cone densities in 15 dpf unablated, control fish vs. regenerated (EdU-positive) cone densities in Met-treated fish, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney rank sum test. (“Regen.” regenerated, “R” red cones, “G” green cones, “UV” UV cones, and “B” blue cones).