Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 27;10:e69523. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69523

Figure 2. Direct comparisons between the alphabetic group and the morpho-syllabic group in structural and functional deficits.

Conjunction analysis showed greater reduction of both GMV and brain activation in the left dorsal IFG in morpho-syllabic languages than alphabetic languages.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Language differences in functional studies and structural studies in children.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Functional deficits in children with DD in each group and common deficits between them.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3. Language differences between the two well-matched groups in the confirmation analysis and how the current results overlap with the original results.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3.