Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 9;8(5):3663–3689. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13531

Table 3.

Clinical studies on the effects of race in TCM patients

Race Author (year) Diagnostic criteria Sample size Type of study Follow‐up Mortality Analysis strategy Risk of bias
Black vs. White Brinjikji et al. (2012) ICD‐9 24 701 Retrospective In‐hospital No difference Multivariable logistic regression High
Vallabhajosyula et al. (2018) ICD‐9 2214 Retrospective In‐hospital OR 1.6 (95% CI 1.1–2.4), P = 0.03 Multivariable logistic regression High
Zaghlol et al. (2020) ICD‐9 97 650 Retrospective In‐hospital No difference Multivariate regression High
Black vs. Hispanic Brinjikji et al. (2012) ICD‐9 24 701 Retrospective In‐hospital No difference Multivariable logistic regression High
Hispanic vs. White Vallabhajosyula et al. (2018) ICD‐9 2214 Retrospective In‐hospital No difference Multivariable logistic regression High
Asian vs. White Brinjikji et al. (2012) ICD‐9 24 701 Retrospective In‐hospital No difference Multivariable logistic regression High
Vallabhajosyula et al. (2018) ICD‐9 2214 Retrospective In‐hospital No difference Multivariable logistic regression High
Non‐White vs. White Napierkowski et al. (2021) ICD‐9 14 639 Retrospective In‐hospital OR 1.412 (95% CI 1.071–1.861), P = 0.015 Multivariable logistic regression High

AAs, African Americans; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio; TCM, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.