Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;8(5):4055–4066. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13488

Table 2.

Abnormal PTFV1 predicts independently pathological atrial function

n = 56 Univariate linear regression analysis

Multivariate linear regression analysis

Adj. r 2 = 0.402; P < 0.001

LA conduit strain (%) B (95% CI) P‐value B (95% CI) P‐value
Abnormal PTFV1 (≥4000 μV*ms) −8.703 (−14.521; −2.885) 0.004 −7.336 (−13.577; −1.095) 0.022
Age (years) −0.426 (−0.691; −0.160) 0.002 −0.416 (−0.683; −0.149) 0.003
LVEF (%) 0.548 (0.280; 0.815) <0.001 0.419 (1.121; 0.717) 0.007
NT‐pro‐BNP (pg/mL) −0.002 (−0.004; 0.000) 0.096 0.002 (−0.001; 0.004) 0.171
CK max (U/L) −0.002 (−0.004; 0.000) 0.121 −0.001 (−0.003; 0.001) 0.478
STEMI −1.158 (−13.077; 10.762) 0.845
Male −0.893 (−8.034; 6.248) 0.803
Body mass index (kg/m2) −0.186 (−1.059; 0.687) 0.671
systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 0.025 (−0.111; 0.160) 0.717

CI, confidence interval; CK, creatine kinase; LA, left atrial; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT‐pro‐BNP, N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide; PTFV1, P‐wave terminal force in lead V1; STEMI, ST‐elevation myocardial infarction.

Linear regression analyses between an abnormal PTFV1 and left atrial conduit strain in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Bold font is used to highlight statistically significant P‐values < 0.05.