Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2021 Jun 28;206(5):1222–1231. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001940

Table 3:

Comparison of organisms recovered using standard urine culture and expanded quantitative urine culture.

Standard Urine Culture Organisms Recovered on EQUC
Actinomyces turicensis
Actinotignum schaalii
Anaerobic gram positive rods
Aspergillus spp*
Bifidobacterium spp*
Candida glabrata
No growth Corynebacterium coyleae
C. riegelii
Diphtheroids spp*
Aerococcus urinae
Enterococcus faecalis
Escherichia coli
Gardnerella vaginalis
Lactobacillus species
 L. casei/paracasei/rhamnosus
 L. crispatus
 L. delbrueckii
 L. fermentum
 L. gasseri/acidophilus
 L. hominis
 L. iners
 L. jensenii
Leuconostoc spp*
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Staphylococcus species
 S. epidermidis
 S. hominus
 S. lugdunensis
Streptococcus species
 S. anginosus
 S. gallolyticus gallolyticus
 S. gallolyticus pasteurianus
 S. mitis
 S. oralis
 S. parasanguinis
 S. sanguinis
 S. spp*
Lactobacillus spp. Bifidobacterium spp
Gardnerella vaginalis
Lactobacillus species
 L. casei/paracasei/rhamnosus
 L. gasseri/acidophilus
 L. jensenii
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Streptococcus anginosus

EQUC, expanded quantitative urine culture; spp, species

*

Microbe could not be identified beyond genus level