Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Apr 14;14(11):2186–2195. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.03.019

TABLE 3.

Multivariate Analysis for Events in Nonobstructive CAD (1% to 49% Stenosis Left Main or 1% to 69% Stenosis Any Coronary Artery)

HR (95% CI) p Value
Model 1: Traditional CV risk (n = 2,586)
 Age (continuous) 1.00 (0.97–1.04) 0.813
 Male sex (vs. female sex) 0.87 (0.55–1.38) 0.561
 ASCVD risk (continuous) 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 0.007*
Model 2: CAD characteristics (n = 2,297)
 ≥2 HRP (vs. <2 HRP) 2. 24 (1.17–4.30) 0.015*
 CAC (continuous) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.101
 SIS (continuous) 1.05 (0.95–1.15) 0.343
 Mild/moderate stenosis (vs. minimal stenosis) 1.87 (1.10–3.16) 0.021*
Model 3: Traditional CV risk plus
 CAD characteristics (using covariates with p < 0.20 from models 1 and 2) (n = 2,271)
 ASCVD risk (continuous) 1.03 (1.01–1.04) 0.001*
 ≥2 HRP (vs. <2 HRP) 2.40 (1.25–4.58) 0.008*
 Mild/moderate stenosis (vs. minimal stenosis) 1.91 (1.16–3.16) 0.011*
 CAC (continuous) 1.00 (0.9999–1.0006) 0.096
*

Significant (p < 0.05).

Similar results are found when using log CAC instead of CAC.

Results are similar when using a full specified model that includes all variables (Supplemental Table 1).

CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; other abbreviations as in Tables 1 and 2.