Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 24;12:707723. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.707723

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies and outcome events.

References Countries Publications Treatment group (No. of participants) Daily levodopa dose, mg (mean ± SD) Male (%) Mean age ± SD (year) Study period Outcome events
Dupont et al. (29) 7 Movement disorders PLA (33)
vs. TOL (32)
PLA 588.2 ± 33Tol 665.9 ± 36.7 PLA 57.6%
TOL 53.1%
PLA 66 ± 8TOL 66 ± 9 6 weeks b,c,d
Waters et al. (34) Canada, US Neurology PLA (102)
vs. TOL (98)
PLA 364.3 ± 13.2TOL 381.9 ±13.2 PLA 59.8%
TOL 60.2%
PLA 67 ± 10TOL 63 ± 11 24–48 weeks b,c,e,
Rajput et al. (35) Canada, US Neurology PLA (66)
vs. TOL (67)
PLA 948 ± 46.9TOL 865.8 ± 47.4 PLA 71%
TOL 78%
PLA 65 ± 10TOL 64 ± 9 12 weeks b,c,e
Rinne et al. (17) 16 Neurology PLA (86)
vs. ENT (85)
PLA 705 ± 283ENT 701 ± 293 PLA 55.2%
ENT 54.6%
PLA 62.8 ± 8.7ENT 63.7 ± 9.88 24 weeks a,b
Baas et al. (33) Europe J Neurol Neurosurgery Psychiatry PLA (58)
vs. TOL (59)
PLA 660.9 ± 46.6TOL675.8 ± 42.4 PLA 60%
TOL 56%
PLA 64 ± 8TOL 63 ± 9 12 weeks a,c,e
Shan et al. (31) China Can. J. Neurol. Sci. PLA (20)
vs. TOL (20)
PLA 930 ± 131.6TOL 795 ± 71.3 PLA 80%
TOL 85%
PLA 67 ± 7TOL 63 ± 4 6 weeks a,b,c
Poewe et al. (19) Germany, Austria Acta Neurol Scand PLA (104)
vs. ENT (197)
PLA 572 ± 329ENT 570 ± 273 PLA 48%
ENT 40%
PLA 61.1 ± 9.9ENT 60.7 ± 9.6 24 weeks a,b,c,d,e
Brooks and Sagar (18) UK, Republic of Ireland J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry PLA (57)
vs. ENT (115)
PLA 712 ± 369ENT 682 ± 390 PLA 40%
ENT 60%
PLA 64.7 ± 8.5ENT 65.9 ± 8.9 24 weeks a,b,c,d,e
Fénelon et al. (20) UK J Neural Transm PLA (63)
vs. ENT (99)
N/A PLA 60%
ENT 64%
PLA 65.0 ± 6.61ENT 63.5 ± 9.96 12 weeks a,c,d,e
Reichmann et al. (25) N/A Acta Neurol Scand PLA (96)
vs. ENT (174)
PLA 533 ± 231ENT 566 ± 243 PLA 59%
ENT 54%
PLA 66 ± 9ENT 67 ± 8 13 weeks a,c,d,e
Rascol et al. (24) Europe, Israel, Argentina Lancet PLA (229)
vs. ENT (227)
PLA 697 ± 295ENT 706 ± 321 PLA 58%
ENT 61
PLA 64.8 ± 8.8ENT 63.0 ± 9.4 18 weeks d,e
Mizuno et al. (22) Japan Movement disorders PLA (95)
vs. ENT (88)
PLA 431.1 ± 130.7ENT 455.1 ± 161.0 PLA 44.2%
ENT 46.6%
PLA 62.7 ± 9.9ENT 62.7 ± 8.7 8 weeks a,b,d,e
Ferreira et al. (21) Europe, South America CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics PLA (49)
vs. ENT (50)
PLA 712 ± 298ENT 709 ± 307 PLA 65.3%
ENT 54%
PLA 64.1 ± 10.01ENT 65.3 ± 8.6 8 weeks d
Rascol et al. (23) 20 Clinical Neuropharmacology PLA (247)
vs. ENT (234)
N/A PLA 60%
ENT 58%
PLA 63.6 ± 8.82ENT 63.7 ± 9.88 18 weeks a
Ferreira et al. (36) 20 Lancet Neurol PLA (121)
vs. ENT (122)
vs. OPI (115)
PLA 675 ± 302ENT 645 ± 323OPI 695 ± 338 PLA 59%
ENT 62% OPI 60%
PLA 64.3 ± 9.3ENT 63.7 ± 7.7OPI 63.5 ± 9.2 14–15 weeks a,c,d,e
Lees et al. (27) 12 JAMA Neurology PLA (135)
vs. OPI (147)
PLA 714 ± 338OPI 700 ± 312 PLA 52.6%
OPI 60.5%
PLA 61.5 ± 8.9OPI 65.5 ± 8.4 14–15weeks a,b,d,e
Takeda et al. (28) Japan Movement disorders PLA (147)
vs. OPI (145)
PLA 422.3 ± 170.1OPI 445.3 ± 175.8 PLA 56%
OPI 60%
PLA 68.5 ± 8.6OPI 67.4 ± 7.8 14–15 weeks a,b,d,e

PLA, Placebo; OPI, Opicapone; ENT, Entacapone; TOL, Tolcapone; N/A, not application; a, the total ON-time; b, the scores of UPDRS PartIII; c, the total daily dose of levodopa; d, adverse event; e, dyskinesia symptom.