Table 3.

ORs for eating pathology considering both negative and positive body image indicators.

Criterion	Indicators	Predictors	S.E.	Wald's coeff. (p)	OR	95% CI L-U
EAT-26	Negative BI (1)	BMI	0.140	0.427 (0.508)	0.913	−8.404 to 0.721
		PBI-IBI	0.334	0.976 (0.355)	1.391	–.593 to 114.821
		Negative attitudes	0.987	5.871 (0.021)	10.925	0.135 to 440.794
	Positive BI (2)	BMI	0.124	0.032 (0.879)	0.978	−0.458 to 0.291
		Body satisfaction	0.555	0.027 (0.883)	0.913	−1.599 to 1.583
		Body appreciation	0.825	0.095 (0.745)	0.776	−3.414 to 1.882
CHAD-B	Negative BI (3)	BMI	0.242	1.680 (0.056)	0.731	−122.735 to 16.771
		PBI-IBI	0.437	1.757 (0.067)	1.785	−6.429 to 62.020
		Negative attitudes	2.628	7.333 (0.002)	12.312	5.146 to 1,831.180
	Positive BI (4)	BMI	0.122	0.013 (0.916)	0.986	−0.516 to 0.337
		Body satisfaction	0.582	0.025 (0.868)	0.912	−1.879 to 2.817
		Body appreciation	0.972	3.379 (0.043)	0.168	–10.063 to 0.048

0 = no risk, 1 = risk. S.E., Standard error; 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval; L, Lower limit; U, Upper limit. 95% CI not including the value 1 are bolded, noting significant prediction estimations. Bootstrapping n = 1,000. Omnibus test models 1 = χ²= 7.887, p < 0.05, 2 = χ²= 0.647, p > 0.05, 3 = χ²= 30.530, p < 0.001, 4 = χ²= 16.464, p = 0.001. Nagelkerke's R² models 1 = 0.28, 2 = 0.03, 3 = 0.73, 4 = 0.46. Hosmer Lemeshow's test models 1 = χ²= 10.336, p > 0.05, 2 = χ²= 2.125, p > 0.05, 3 = χ²= 5.528, p > 0.05, 4 = χ²= 5.773, p > 0.05. Predictive power models 1 = 86.7% of cases correctly classified, model 2 = 84.4%, model 3 = 88.9%, model 4 = 82.2%.