Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 8;12(12):3086–3100. doi: 10.1007/s12671-021-01772-9

Table 7.

Generalized estimating equations results testing intervention effect on optimal sleep

Model 5A Model 5B
Coefficient B SE Wald 95% LL 95% UL Coefficient B SE Wald 95% LL 95% UL
Intercept 0.08 0.39 0.04  − 0.69 0.85 0.57 0.43 1.77  − 0.27 1.40
Sophomorea 0.94 0.59 2.55  − 0.21 2.08 1.10 0.61 3.33ϯ  − 0.08 2.29
Juniora 0.11 0.40 0.07  − 0.67 0.88  − 0.01 0.41 0.00  − 0.82 0.80
Sex (male) 0.08 0.50 0.02  − 0.90 1.06 0.04 0.49 0.01  − 0.92 1.00
Neuroticism 0.09 0.24 0.15  − 0.38 0.57 0.05 0.22 0.05  − 0.39 0.49
Trait mindfulness 0.32 0.26 1.47  − 0.20 0.84 0.41 0.27 2.31  − 0.12 0.94
Coronavirus worry  − 0.04 0.19 0.04  − 0.41 0.33  − 0.08 0.19 0.18  − 0.45 0.29
Time 0.13 0.08 2.66  − 0.03 0.28  − 0.16 0.09 3.38ϯ  − 0.32 0.01
Intervention 0.28 0.36 0.59  − 0.43 0.99  − 0.16 0.42 0.15  − 0.99 0.67
Intervention × time 0.32 0.13 5.75* 0.06 0.58
QIC goodness of fit 364.2

N = 64 (between subjects) and N = 268 (within subjects). LL/UL, lower/upper confidence interval limit

B, generalized estimation coefficient; SE, standard error

Model 5A does not include the time × intervention coefficient, whereas Model 5B does

aReference group = senior

*p < .05; **p < .01; ϯp < .10