Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2021 Sep 10;297(4):101180. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101180

Activation of the cytosolic calcium-independent phospholipase A2 β isoform contributes to TRPC6 externalization via release of arachidonic acid

Priya Putta 1,, Andrew H Smith 2, Pinaki Chaudhuri 1, Rocio Guardia-Wolff 1, Michael A Rosenbaum 3, Linda M Graham 1,2
PMCID: PMC8498464  PMID: 34509476

Abstract

During vascular interventions, oxidized low-density lipoprotein and lysophosphatidylcholine (lysoPC) accumulate at the site of arterial injury, inhibiting endothelial cell (EC) migration and arterial healing. LysoPC activates canonical transient receptor potential 6 (TRPC6) channels, leading to a prolonged increase in intracellular calcium ion concentration that inhibits EC migration. However, an initial increase in intracellular calcium ion concentration is required to activate TRPC6, and this mechanism remains elusive. We hypothesized that lysoPC activates the lipid-cleaving enzyme phospholipase A2 (PLA2), which releases arachidonic acid (AA) from the cellular membrane to open arachidonate-regulated calcium channels, allowing calcium influx that promotes externalization and activation of TRPC6 channels. The focus of this study was to identify the roles of calcium-dependent and/or calcium-independent PLA2 in lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization. We show that lysoPC induced PLA2 enzymatic activity and caused AA release in bovine aortic ECs. To identify the specific subgroup and the isoform(s) of PLA2 involved in lysoPC-induced TRPC6 activation, transient knockdown studies were performed in the human endothelial cell line EA.hy926 using siRNA to inhibit the expression of genes encoding cPLA2α, cPLA2γ, iPLA2β, or iPLA2γ. Downregulation of the β isoform of iPLA2 blocked lysoPC-induced release of AA from EC membranes and TRPC6 externalization, as well as preserved EC migration in the presence of lysoPC. We propose that blocking TRPC6 activation and promoting endothelial healing could improve the outcomes for patients undergoing cardiovascular interventions.

Keywords: endothelial cell, canonical transient receptor potential 6 channel (TRPC6 channel), migration, calcium channel, phospholipase A2, lysophosphatidylcholine

Abbreviations: [Ca2+]i, intracellular calcium ion concentration; AA, arachidonic acid; BAECs, bovine aortic ECs; cPLA2, cytosolic calcium-dependent PLA2; EC, endothelial cell; FBS, fetal bovine serum; HPA, heneicosapentaenoic acid; iPLA2, cytosolic calcium-independent PLA2; lysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; NsiRNA, negative control siRNA; oxLDL, oxidized low-density lipoprotein; PLA2, phospholipase A2; TRPC, canonical transient receptor potential


Endothelial cell (EC) healing is crucial for successful vascular interventions (1, 2, 3). Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) accumulates at the site of arterial injury caused by vascular interventions and inhibits EC migration. The major component of oxLDL that accounts for its antimigratory property is lysophosphatidylcholine (lysoPC) (4). We have previously shown that lysoPC inhibits EC migration in vitro (5), and hypercholesterolemia inhibits EC healing of arterial injuries in vivo (6). One of the mechanisms involved in inhibition of EC migration/healing is the activation of canonical transient receptor potential (TRPC) channels, specifically TRPC6, and the subsequent prolonged increase in intracellular calcium ion concentration ([Ca2+]i) (7, 8). A transient increase in the [Ca2+]i is essential to initiate EC migration (9, 10). However, the sustained increase in [Ca2+]i specifically due to TRPC6 to TRPC5 channel activation cascade (11) disrupts EC focal adhesions and cytoskeleton that regulate cell movement, thus impeding EC migration essential for injury repair (5). In a mouse arterial injury model, a high-cholesterol diet significantly impairs endothelial healing in WT mice but is not inhibitory in TRPC6 null mice (6). This suggests that blocking lipid oxidation product(s)-induced TRPC6 activation could promote more rapid EC healing leading to improved outcomes after vascular interventions.

TRPC6 channel translocation (i.e., externalization) to the plasma membrane is an essential step that proceeds TRPC6 channel activation. Our previous studies suggest that lysoPC causes an initial local increase in [Ca2+]i that is essential to activate TRPC6 channels (8). However, the mechanism by which lysoPC activates TRPC6 and, more specifically, the mechanism of lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization to the plasma membrane still remain unclear. LysoPC can activate phospholipase A2 (PLA2) to release arachidonic acid (AA) from EC membranes (12, 13). This AA can activate arachidonate-regulated calcium channels in the plasma membrane (14), and the subsequent Ca2+ entry can provide the local increase in [Ca2+]i required to externalize TRPC6 channels. Our working hypothesis is outlined in Figure 1. Currently, no TRPC6 inhibitors are available for clinical use, but inhibiting PLA2 activity could potentially block the lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization and, therefore, block the activation pathway.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic of our working hypothesis. We hypothesize that lysoPC activates phospholipase A2 (PLA2), which releases arachidonic acid (AA) from the cellular membrane to open arachidonate-regulated calcium (ARC) channels allowing calcium influx that causes TRPC6 channel externalization. The cascade of events after TRPC6 externalization in turn inhibits EC migration. EC, endothelial cell; lysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; oxLDL, oxidized low-density lipoprotein; TRPC, canonical transient receptor potential.

PLA2 is a superfamily of at least 16 groups of enzymes responsible for the breakdown of glycerophospholipids into lysophospholipids and generation of AA required for eicosanoid and prostaglandin synthesis (15, 16). PLA2 enzymes are broadly divided into secretory, cytosolic calcium-dependent (group IV or cPLA2), and cytosolic calcium-independent (group VI or iPLA2) subgroups (16). cPLA2 and iPLA2 are the two subgroups most abundantly present in ECs (17). These two subgroups are further divided into various isoforms, including cPLA2-α, cPLA2-β, cPLA2-γ, and cPLA2-δ, and iPLA2-β, iPLA2-γ, -iPLA2-ζ, -iPLA2-η, and -iPLA2-δ (15). The cPLA2α-isoform (or group IVA) is the most abundant and well-studied cPLA2 isoform, and it contains the characteristic calcium-binding C2 domain required for its activation. However, this calcium-binding C2 domain is lacking in the γ isoform of cPLA2 (group IVC), thus making cPLA2γ the only known calcium-independent group IV cPLA2 isoform (15). cPLA2α is involved in EC proliferation and cell cycle progression (18, 19). cPLA2γ, although present in the heart, skeletal muscle, and cultured synoviocytes, has unclear biological function (20). Among group VI iPLA2, the well-described isoforms are iPLA2β and iPLA2γ, and both are involved in cell proliferation and membrane remodeling, among other functions (21).

The purpose of this study is to identify PLA2 subgroup(s) and the specific isoform(s) that contribute to lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization and inhibition of EC migration. We show that iPLA2β is the primary isoform involved in lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization. Inhibiting iPLA2β blocks lysoPC-induced AA release from EC membranes, blocks TRPC6 externalization, and preserves EC migration.

Results

LysoPC activated phospholipase enzyme activity and caused AA release in bovine aortic ECs

To determine if lysoPC activated PLA2, PLA2 enzyme activity was assessed in bovine aortic ECs (BAECs). ECs were serum-starved for 18 h, and then, 12.5 μM lysoPC was added for 15 min. The cells were lysed, and supernatants were used to determine total PLA2 activity with a synthetic substrate, arachidonoyl thio-PC. Under control conditions, PLA2 activity was 0.119 ± 0.008 μmol/min/mg (Fig. 2A, control). LysoPC increased PLA2 activity to 0.166 ± 0.001 μmol/min/mg (Fig. 2A, LysoPC), significantly higher than control conditions (n = 3, p = 0.0006).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

LysoPC activates phospholipase A2and induces arachidonic acid release from the membrane into the medium.A, confluent BAECs were serum-starved for 18 h and then incubated with or without lysoPC (12.5 μM) for 15 min. The cells were then lysed, and the supernatant was assessed for total PLA2 enzyme activity. B and C, confluent BAECs were serum-starved for 18 h and then incubated with or without lysoPC (12.5 μM) for 15 min, and cells were lysed and the membrane fraction isolated. B, AA content of the membrane fraction was measured by ELISA. C, AA released into the medium was measured by LC/MS/MS. Values shown are the means ± SD (n = 3), analyzed with Student's t test and p values calculated. BAECs, bovine aortic ECs; lysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; PLA2, phospholipase A2.

Next, to determine if lysoPC induced release of AA, the AA content of the membrane fraction and the medium was measured. Serum-starved BAECs were incubated with or without 12.5 μM lysoPC for 15 min. The membrane fraction and the medium were isolated to determine the AA content. In the membrane fraction, the AA content was 1.56 ± 0.10 μg/ml in control cells but was reduced to 1.07 ± 0.048 μg/ml in cells incubated with lysoPC (n = 3, p < 0.0001, Fig. 2B). In contrast, the AA content in the medium was 0.11 ± 0.008 ng/ml in control cells, which increased to 2.59 ± 0.080 ng/ml in cells incubated with lysoPC (n = 3, p < 0.0001, Fig. 2C). The reduction in the membrane AA content suggested that lysoPC induced the release of AA from the BAEC membranes.

Downregulation of iPLA2β but not iPLA2γ, cPLA2α, or cPLA2γ blocked lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization

To identify the role of cPLA2 or iPLA2 and the specific isoform(s) involved in lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization, siRNA-mediated downregulation of PLA2 isoforms was undertaken. EA.hy926 cells, a human umbilical vein cell line, were transiently transfected with 25 nmol of cPLA2α siRNA, cPLA2γ siRNA, iPLA2β siRNA, or iPLA2γ siRNA. This resulted in a significant decrease in the mRNA levels of the respective isoforms in the siRNA-transfected cells compared with the negative control siRNA (NsiRNA)-transfected cells (n = 3; Fig. 3, AD). cPLA2α and γ mRNA levels decreased by 96% (n = 3, p = 0.0003, Fig. 3A) and 91% (n = 3, p = 0.0001, Fig. 3B), respectively. iPLA2β and γ mRNA levels decreased by 78% (n = 3, p = 0.0014, Fig. 3C) and 96% (n = 3, p = 0.0001, Fig. 3D), respectively. Downregulation of one isoform did not significantly affect the mRNA expression of the other isoform of the same subgroup (Fig. 3, AD).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

mRNA and protein expression in siRNA-mediated subgroup-specific PLA2isoform downregulation. EA.hy926 cells were transiently transfected with 25 nM of control siRNA (NsiRNA) or cPLA2α, cPLA2γ, iPLA2β, or iPLA2γ siRNA for 6 h in serum-free medium and then placed in medium with 10% FBS. AD, siRNA-mediated downregulation of (A) cPLA2α, (B) cPLA2γ (C) iPLA2β, or (D) iPLA2γ was quantified using qRT-PCR at 48 h. Values shown are the means ± SD (n = 3), analyzed with one-way ANOVA using Tukey’s multiple comparison test, and p values were calculated. E and F, representative immunoblots depict siRNA-mediated downregulation of PLA2 isoforms (E) cPLA2α, (F) cPLA2γ (G) iPLA2β, and (H) iPLA2γ, detected using subgroup-specific antibody at 48 h after initiation of transfection (n = 3). Line in panel E indicates lanes rearranged from the same gel. FBS, fetal bovine serum; PLA2, phospholipase A2.

The decrease in mRNA levels corresponded to a decrease in the protein levels (Fig. 3, EH). cPLA2 band at ∼90 kD, representing the α-isoform, was present in the NsiRNA-transfected cells and was significantly attenuated in the cPLA2α siRNA-transfected cells (Fig. 3E). Similarly, cPLA2 band at ∼60 kD, representing the cPLA2γ isoform, was present in the NsiRNA-transfected cells and was significantly attenuated in the cPLA2γ siRNA-transfected cells (Fig. 3F). Two distinct bands for iPLA2, at ∼90 kDa and ∼63 kDa, were seen in the NsiRNA-transfected cells and were significantly attenuated in both iPLA2β and iPLA2γ siRNA-transfected cells (Fig. 3, G and H). Downregulation of one subgroup did not affect the protein expression of the other subgroup (Fig. 3, EH).

The effect of cPLA2α, cPLA2γ, iPLA2β, or iPLA2γ downregulation on TRPC6 externalization was assessed by biotinylation assay in transfected EA.hy926 cells (Fig. 4, AD). At baseline, externalized TRPC6 was comparable for control (NsiRNA), cPLA2α, cPLA2γ, iPLA2β, or iPLA2γ siRNA-transfected cells. Incubation with 10 μM lysoPC for 15 min increased TRPC6 externalization in ECs transfected with NsiRNA. Downregulation of cPLA2α did not result in a significant decrease in lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization (n = 3; p = 0.057 compared with NsiRNA with lysoPC, Fig. 4A). Similarly, downregulation of cPLA2γ isoform did not block lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization (n = 3; p = 0.53 compared with NsiRNA with lysoPC, Fig. 4B). Interestingly, the lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization was significantly attenuated in iPLA2β downregulated cells compared with NsiRNA with lysoPC (n = 3, p < 0.003, Fig. 4C). Transient knockdown of iPLA2γ, however, did not alter the lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization (n = 3; p > 0.8 compared with NsiRNA with lysoPC, Fig. 4D). These results suggested that lysoPC primarily activated iPLA2β to promote externalization of TRPC6.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Downregulation of iPLA2β isoform blocks lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization.AD, ECs were transiently transfected with NsiRNA or isoform-specific siRNA and serum-starved for 6 h. Then, lysoPC (10 μM) was added for 15 min, and externalized TRPC6 was detected by biotinylation assay. Total TRPC6 was detected in an aliquot of the cell lysate removed before biotinylation, and actin served as a loading control. Representative blots are shown in panel (A) cPLA2α, (B) cPLA2γ, (C) iPLA2β, and (D) iPLA2γ. Lines indicate lanes rearranged from the same gel. Densitometric measurements of externalized TRPC6 are represented in graphic form (n = 3), analyzed with one-way ANOVA using Tukey’s multiple comparison test, and p values were calculated. NsiRNA (•); cPLA2α, cPLA2γ, iPLA2β, or iPLA2γ siRNA (▾); cPLA2α, cPLA2γ, iPLA2β, or iPLA2γ siRNA + lysoPC (♦); NsiRNA + lysoPC (▪). iPLA2, cytosolic calcium-independent PLA2; lysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; ns, not significant; NsiRNA, negative control siRNA; PLA2, phospholipase A2; TRPC, canonical transient receptor potential.

Downregulation of iPLA2β and not iPLA2γ, cPLA2α, or cPLA2γ blocked lysoPC-induced inhibition of EC migration

The effect of cPLA2α, cPLA2γ, iPLA2β, or iPLA2γ downregulation on lysoPC-induced inhibition of EC migration was assessed by razor scrape assay in EA.hy926 transfected cells (Fig. 5). Basal EC migration for NsiRNA, cPLA2α siRNA, cPLA2γ siRNA, iPLA2β siRNA, or iPLA2γ siRNA-transfected cells was similar (Fig. 5, AD). In ECs transfected with NsiRNA, lysoPC reduced migration by ∼55 to 60% (n = 3; p < 0.001, Fig. 5, AD). In cPLA2α siRNA-transfected ECs, lysoPC inhibited migration by ∼70% (n = 3; p = 0.44, comparable with NsiRNA with lysoPC, Fig. 5A). Similarly, in cPLA2γ siRNA-transfected ECs, lysoPC inhibited migration by ∼63% (n = 3; p = 0.47 comparable with NsiRNA with lysoPC, Fig. 5B). However, lysoPC inhibited migration by only 15% in iPLA2β downregulated cells (n = 3; p < 0.001 compared with NsiRNA with lysoPC, Fig. 5C). LysoPC continued to inhibit migration in iPLA2γ downregulated ECs, as it did in NsiRNA-transfected EC with lysoPC (n = 3; p > 0.9, Fig. 5D). Individual siRNAs were studied to determine if the effect on migration was due to off-target effect of pooled iPLA2β siRNA. The individual iPLA2β siRNAs (35 nM) showed similar effects compared with the pooled iPLA2β siRNA in preserving EC migration in lysoPC (Fig. S1, A and B). These results suggested that lysoPC activated iPLA2β to inhibit EC migration in an in vitro migration assay.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Downregulation of iPLA2β isoform preserves EC migration in the presence of lysoPC.AD, ECs were transiently transfected with NsiRNA or isoform-specific siRNA and then serum-starved for 6 h. The migration assay was initiated ± lysoPC (10 μM). Migration was quantified at 24 h. The arrow indicates the starting line of cell migration for assessment of the effect of (A) cPLA2α, and (B) cPLA2γ, (C) iPLA2β, or (D) iPLA2γ downregulation. The graphs represent mean ± SD (n = 4), analyzed with one-way ANOVA using Tukey’s multiple comparison test, and p values were calculated. Representative images of four experiments are shown, 40× magnification; the scale bar represents 100 μm. cPLA2, cytosolic calcium-dependent PLA2; EC, endothelial cell; iPLA2, cytosolic calcium-independent PLA2; lysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; ns, not significant; NsiRNA, negative control siRNA.

Downregulation of iPLA2β inhibited lysoPC-induced release of AA

To ascertain if downregulation of iPLA2β prevented the lysoPC-induced AA release from the membrane, AA ELISA assay was performed in transfected EA.hy926 cells. Cells were incubated with lysoPC for 15 min, then lysed, the membrane and medium fractions were isolated to assess the AA content (Fig. 6). AA content for NsiRNA and iPLA2β siRNA transfected cell membranes was similar. LysoPC decreased the AA in the membrane in NsiRNA-transfected cells by 0.175 ± 0.041 μg/ml, but by only 0.0583 ± 0.050 μg/ml in iPLA2β siRNA-transfected cells (n = 3, p < 0.036, Fig. 6A). This confirmed that iPLA2β downregulation blocked lysoPC-induced release of AA from EC membranes. Similarly, lysoPC increased the AA content in the medium fraction of NsiRNA-transfected cells by 2.433 ± 0.305 ng/ml, but by only 1.4 ± 0.1 ng/ml in iPLA2β siRNA-transfected cells (n = 3, p < 0.005, Fig. 6B). The prevention of lysoPC-induced AA release from EC membranes in iPLA2β downregulated cells could contribute to the preservation of EC migration in the presence of lysoPC.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Downregulation of iPLA2β isoform blocks lysoPC-induced arachidonic acid release from the membrane into medium.A and B, ECs transfected with NsiRNA or iPLA2β siRNA were serum-starved for 6 h, then lysoPC (10 μM) added for 15 min. Cells were lysed, and the AA content of the membrane fraction was measured by ELISA, and the AA content in the medium was measured by LC/MS/MS. A, lysoPC-induced change in AA content in membrane fraction. B, lysoPC-induced change in AA content in the medium. Values shown are the means ± SD (n = 3), analyzed with Student's t test and p values calculated. EC, endothelial cell; iPLA2, cytosolic calcium-independent PLA2; lysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; NsiRNA, negative control siRNA.

Downregulation of iPLA2β inhibited lysoPC-induced increase in [Ca2+]i

We evaluated if downregulation of iPLA2β prevented the lysoPC-induced increase in [Ca2+]i using fluorometric assay. EA.hy926 cells transfected with NsiRNA or iPLA2β siRNA were loaded with the FITC-conjugated fluorophore Calbryte 520 AM dye. The ECs were suspended and loaded into the sort chamber of a BD FACSMelody Cell Sorter maintained at 37 °C. After adjusting the baseline, lysoPC (10 μM) was added and the change in [Ca2+]i was recorded. LysoPC increased [Ca2+]i in NsiRNA-transfected cells to 1.38 times the baseline (representative graph, Fig. 7A), but only to 1.02 times in iPLA2β siRNA-transfected cells (representative graph, Fig. 7B). iPLA2β siRNA-transfected cells significantly attenuated lysoPC-induced increase in [Ca2+]i (n = 3, p < 0.029, Fig. 7C). These results supported the role of iPLA2β in lysoPC-induced increase in [Ca2+]i required for TRPC6 externalization and inhibition of EC migration.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Downregulation of iPLA2β isoform inhibits lysoPC-induced increase in [Ca2+]i. ECs transfected with NsiRNA and iPLA2β siRNA were serum-starved for 6 h. ECs were loaded with the FITC-conjugated fluorophore Calbryte 520 AM dye. The ECs were suspended and loaded into the sort chamber of a BD FACSMelody Cell Sorter maintained at 37 °C. After adjusting the baseline, lysoPC (10 μM) was added. AC, using the kinetic reading mode at Ex/Em 490/525 nm, relative changes in [Ca2+]i after transfection with (A) NsiRNA or (B) iPLA2β siRNA were determined. Representative graphs of three experiments are shown here. C, change in [Ca2+]i measured by difference in mean [Ca2+]i at baseline and after addition of lysoPC is presented in the graph. Values shown are the means ± SD (n = 3), analyzed with Student's t test and p values calculated. iPLA2, cytosolic calcium-independent PLA2; lysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; EC, endothelial cell; NsiRNA, negative control siRNA.

Discussion

OxLDL and lysoPC inhibit EC migration, and there is sufficient lysoPC in oxLDL to account for its antimigratory activity (4). LysoPC is one of the most potent antimigratory lysophospholipids, and our previous studies have shown that it inhibits EC migration at least in part by activating TRPC6, which leads to a cascade of events resulting in a prolonged increase in [Ca2+]i that activates calpains and inhibits cytoskeletal changes required for migration (5, 11). LysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization requires a small, perhaps localized, increase in [Ca2+]i (8); however, the source of the initial lysoPC-induced calcium flux in ECs is unclear. We postulate that lysoPC activates PLA2 causing release of AA, which in turn opens arachidonate-regulated calcium channels leading to the localized increase in calcium. The goal of this study is to identify the PLA2 involved in lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization and activation leading to inhibition of EC migration. The results presented here demonstrate that lysoPC activates PLA2, in keeping with the findings of Lupo et al. (22) using rat brain ECs and oxLDLs. We also show that lysoPC releases AA from the cell membrane, which is in agreement with Wong et al. (12) who showed lysoPC induces AA release in human umbilical vein ECs. Interestingly, we show that iPLA2, but not cPLA2, mediates lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization. Using siRNA-mediated downregulation of specific isoforms, the β-isoform, but not the γ-isoform, of iPLA2 appears to be responsible for lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization. Downregulating iPLA2β inhibits lysoPC-induced release of AA from the EC membrane, blocks the increase in [Ca2+]i, and preserves EC migration in the presence of lysoPC.

Earlier studies suggest that cPLA2 is the major isoform involved in the AA release from membranes, whereas iPLA2 is a housekeeping protein only involved in the incorporation of free AA into membranes (23, 24, 25). However, later studies show that in addition to its housekeeping function, iPLA2 is involved in signal transduction pathways, as well as generation of AA and other lipid metabolites (26, 27). In fact, a role for iPLA2 is suggested in agonist-induced AA release in aortic smooth muscle cells and RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line (28, 29). Furthermore, Balboa and Balsinde demonstrate the key role of iPLA2 in the release of AA in human U937 cells during oxidative stress (30, 31). In addition, the role of iPLA2β is associated with thrombin-induced AA release in human coronary artery ECs (32). Our data are consistent with these studies and suggest a role for iPLA2, specifically the β isoform of iPLA2, in mediating lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization and activation in ECs.

Downregulating iPLA2β modestly inhibits lysoPC-induced release of AA from the EC membrane (Fig. 6) but significantly preserves EC migration in the presence of lysoPC (Fig. 5C). LysoPC-induced AA release from the membrane is a localized event. Upon release, the free AA is either rapidly metabolized or incorporated back into phospholipid pool, or diffused into other cells (33). Wong et al. (12) show that AA release in ECs is both time and concentration dependent, maximal AA release being observed at 10 min with 50 μM lysoPC. In our AA release assay, 10 μM lysoPC is used to align with our functional assays and our previous studies. Hence, we observe the modest difference between lysoPC-induced AA release in cells transfected with NsiRNA compared with iPLA2β siRNA. Furthermore, using the razor scrape assay, we demonstrate that this modest difference in AA release translates into prevention of lysoPC-induced inhibition of EC migration in iPLA2β-downregulated cells (Fig. 5C). AA release is measured minutes after incubation with lysoPC, while migration is measured at 24 h, allowing for a series of events to occur. The robust effect on migration in iPLA2β downregulated cells may reflect the efficacy of AA release inhibition which is upstream in a cascade of events that eventually result in cytoskeletal changes that block migration.

iPLA2β has been shown to be involved in the activation of other TRP channels such as TRPC5 (34) and TRPM8 (35). AL-Shawaf et al. (34) show that downregulation of iPLA2β suppresses sphingosine 1-phosphate–induced, but not lysoPC-induced, TRPC5 channel activation in HEK cells containing conditional expression of TRPC5 (34). Our previous studies in ECs expressing both TRPC6 and TRPC5 show that lysoPC-induced TRPC6 activation precedes TRPC5 activation and that downregulation of TRPC6 suppresses TRPC5 externalization in ECs incubated with lysoPC (11). In our present study, blocking iPLA2β inhibits lysoPC-induced TRPC6 externalization, which should result in decreased TRPC5 activation in cells expressing both channels. The difference in the role of iPLA2β in the TRPC activation in these studies may reflect the variety of mechanisms for TRPC5 activation, including activation by reactive oxygen species, changes in [Ca2+]i, or directly by lysoPC (36, 37).

Oxidized lipid products impede endothelial healing during vascular interventions. We have shown previously that lysoPC disrupts the delicate balance of [Ca2+]i in ECs by activation of TRPC6 and via signal transduction pathways leading to TRPC5 activation and inhibition of EC migration (5, 7, 8, 11, 38). Our present study shows for the first time the role of iPLA2β in the externalization of TRPC6 and subsequent inhibition of EC migration by lysoPC. These results allow for selection of an isoform-specific pharmacological inhibitor, several of which are currently being used in clinical cancer therapy trials, and to test its efficacy to promote endothelial healing in an arterial injury model. Specifically blocking lysoPC-induced iPLA2β activation in ECs should prevent TRPC6 activation and preserve EC migration, thereby improving endothelial healing after interventions for cardiovascular diseases.

Experimental procedures

Cells and reagents

BAECs were isolated from adult bovine aortas by scraping after collagenase treatment (11). Assays involving BAECs were performed in replicates using cells from at least three different bovine aortas. BAECs between passages 4 and 9 were used for the assays. EAhy.926 cells, a primary human umbilical vein cell line, were purchased from the ATCC.

1-Palmitol-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (16:0 LysoPC) (catalog number (#): 855675p) was obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc AA (#90010) and heneicosapentaenoic acid (HPA) (#10670) were purchased from Cayman Chemical. The PLA2 assay kits (#765021) were purchased from Cayman Chemical, and the AA ELISA kits (#MBS2608709 and #MBS267742) were purchased from MyBioSource. Antibodies for immunoblot analysis were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology and Santa Cruz Biotechnology as indicated below. siRNA for transfection studies were purchased from Dharmacon, Inc. ON-TARGETPlus siRNA SMARTpool [PLA2G4A: L-009886-00-0005, PLA2G4C: L-009663-00-0005, PLA2G6: L-009085-00-0005 (J-009085-12-0002 and J-009085-13-0002 individual siRNAs), PLA2G6B: L-010284-00-0005], and the NsiRNA were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (#sc-37007). RNA isolation kits were purchased from Qiagen (miRNeasy mini kit # 217004) and TaqMan assay kits for qRT-PCR were purchased from Thermo Fisher [PLA2G4A (Hs00233352_m1), PLA2G4C (Hs00234345_m1), PLA2G6A (Hs00899715_m1), PLA2G6B (HS00382272-m1), or GAPDH (Hs99999905_m1)].

EC culture

BAECs were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (FBS, HyClone Laboratories #SH30541.03) and 1% antibiotic (penicillin/streptomycin). EA.hy926 were cultured in Eagle's Modified Essential Medium containing 10% (vol/vol) FBS.

Measurement of PLA2 activity

Total PLA2 activity in BAECs was measured using the cPLA2 assay kit. The use of this assay kit without the specific purification procedure allowed measurement of total PLA2 enzyme activity (39, 40). BAECs were grown in 60-mm dishes and serum-starved for 18 h. LysoPC (12.5 μM) was added for 15 min in appropriate dishes. Cells were then lysed in the lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 200 μM Na3VO4, 100 mM NaF, 1% Triton X-100, pH 7.4) containing protease inhibitors (cOmplete, Roche) for 30 min at 4 °C. Lysates were passed through needles, 20-gauge (20×) and 25-gauge (15×), and cleared by centrifugation at 12,000g for 15 min. PLA2 assay was performed as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, sample, blank, and positive control (bee venom) (10 μl) were added to a 96-well plate in triplicates. To initiate the reaction, arachidonoyl Thio-PC (200 μl) substrate was added to each well and mixed and incubated for 60 min at room temperature. DNTB/EGTA was then added to stop the enzymatic reaction and the absorbance read at 405 nm using a plate reader (SpectraMAX 190).

Downregulation of PLA2

EA.hy926 cells at 70 to 80% confluency were incubated with 25 nM siRNA for 6 h using DharmaFECT reagent in serum-free medium according to the manufacturer’s protocol, followed by full replacement of the medium supplemented with 10% FBS for the remainder of the 48 h. siRNA for PLA2G4A, PLA2G4C, PLA2G6A, and PLA2G6B (Dharmacon, Inc) and NsiRNA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used. mRNA was isolated at 48 h with Qiagen miRNeasy mini kit and knockdown efficiency quantified with RT-qPCR using TaqMan assay kits. Samples were analyzed in triplicate, and target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH. Protein level knockdown was assessed at 48 h with immunoblot analysis.

Measurement of the AA content in the membrane and medium

BAECs or transfected EA.hy926 cells were serum-starved for 18 h or 6 h, respectively. LysoPC (12.5 μM or 10 μM) was then added for 15 min. Cells were processed as per the manufacturer’s protocol using the Mem-PER Plus membrane extraction kit (Thermo Fisher) to obtain the membrane fraction. Briefly, cells were washed and centrifuged, the pellet was resuspended in the permeabilization buffer (350 μl), incubated for 10 min at 4 °C, and centrifuged at 16,000g for 15 min at 4 °C. The cytosolic fraction was carefully separated, the pellet was further resuspended in the solubilization buffer (250 μl) for 30 min at 4 °C, and centrifuged at 16,000g for 15 min to collect the membrane fraction. The AA content of the membrane fraction was measured using an AA ELISA kit as per the manufacturer’s protocol and the absorbance read at 450 nm using a plate reader (SpectraMAX 190).

For AA measurement, the medium was collected and processed using HPLC On-line LC/MS/MS. Briefly, the cell medium (500 μl) was mixed with methanol (50 μl) containing 2 μg/ml HPA as the internal standard and dried under N2 flow. Methanol 75% (50 μl) was added to the dried sample, vortexed, and then filtered through a 0.22-μm membrane. A 5-μl aliquot was injected to the Vanquish HPLC and Quantiva triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher) (41). XCalibur software was used to process the data and obtain the peak areas of AA and HPA. The internal standard calibration curve was used to calculate the concentration of AA in the samples.

Immunoblot analysis

Immunoblot analysis was performed as previously described (11). Proteins of interest were detected using antibodies specific for rabbit TRPC6 (1:1000, Cell Signaling #16716S), rabbit cPLA2 (1:1000, Cell Signaling #2832), mouse iPLA2 (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-376563), and β-actin (1:2000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc47778 HRP). Anti-rabbit (1:1000, antibodies-online #ABIN102010) or anti-mouse (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology #SC516102) antibodies were used for secondary antibodies.

TRPC6 externalization by biotinylation assay

Biotinylation of EC membrane surface proteins was performed as previously described (42). Briefly, transfected EA.hy926 cells were cultured in 60-mm dishes to 80% confluency and serum-starved for 6 h, and then lysoPC (10 μM) was added for 15 min. Externalized TRPC6 was detected by the biotinylation assay (42) and immunoblot analysis was performed.

EC migration

EC migration was assessed in a razor scrape assay in 12-well tissue culture plates as previously described (43). Briefly, transfected EA.hy926 cells were serum-starved for 6 h. The razor scrape was performed and cells allowed to migrate ± lysoPC (10 μM) for 24 h. Using a digital CCD camera mounted on a phase-contrast microscope, images were taken of three random fields, each corresponding to a starting line length of 1.6 mm, from three wells. Images were processed using NIH ImageJ analysis software (NIH, Bethesda, MD), and an observer blinded to the experimental conditions quantitated the migration.

Measurement of [Ca2+]i

ECs at 80 to 90% confluence were loaded with the FITC132 conjugated fluorophore Calbryte 520 AM dye (AAT Bioquest; Catalog No. 36310) following the manufacturer’s protocol. After 35 min, the EC were suspended and loaded into the sort chamber of a BD FACSMelody Cell Sorter (BD Biosciences) maintained at 37 °C. After adjusting the baseline, 10 μM lysoPC was added and relative change in [Ca2+]i was read using the kinetic reading mode at Ex/Em 490/525 nm. Kinetics data were analyzed using the FlowJo v10 software (BD Biosciences).

Statistics analysis

All experiments were performed at least in triplicate. Studies with BAECs used ECs isolated from at least three different animals. Values are presented as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed by Student's t test or one-way ANOVA with appropriate post hoc analysis, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Data availability

All the data described in the article are contained within the article.

Supporting information

This article contains supporting information.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Cleveland Clinic core facilities Flow Cytometry and Proteomics and Metabolomics and thank Amy Graham for technical assistance with calcium studies and Dr Renliang Zhang for assistance with LC/MS/MS studies. The authors also thank Dr Sajeesh Thapi for invaluable advice with transfection and qPCR standardization and Parag Joshi for input during brainstorming and discussion sessions.

Author contributions

P. P., P. C., and L. M. G. conceptualization; P. P., P. C., and L. M. G. data curation; P. P., P. C., and L. M. G. formal analysis; P. P. and L. M. G. validation; P. P., A. H. S., R. G.-W., M. A. R., and L. M. G. investigation; P. P., P. C., M. A. R., and L. M. G. visualization; P. P., P. C., and L. M. G. methodology; P. P. writing–original draft; P. P., A. H. S., R. G.-W., P. C., M. A. R., and L. M. G. writing–review and editing; L. M. G. supervision; L. M. G. funding acquisition; L. M. G. project administration.

Funding and additional information

This work was supported by NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant R01-HL-064357 (to L. M. G.) and by Career Development Award #IK2BX003628 from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service (to M. A. R). The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the views of the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, or the United States government.

Edited by Dennis Voelker

Supporting information

Supplemental Figure S1
mmc1.pdf (204.6KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Barton M., Haudenschild C.C. Endothelium and atherogenesis: Endothelial therapy revisited. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2001;38 Suppl 2:S23–S25. doi: 10.1097/00005344-200111002-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Haudenschild C.C., Schwartz S.M. Endothelial regeneration. II. Restitution of endothelial continuity. Lab. Invest. 1979;41:407–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schwartz S.M., Haudenschild C.C., Eddy E.M. Endothelial regneration. I. Quantitative analysis of initial stages of endothelial regeneration in rat aortic intima. Lab. Invest. 1978;38:568–580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Murugesan G., Fox P.L. Role of lysophosphatidylcholine in the inhibition of endothelial cell motility by oxidized low density lipoprotein. J. Clin. Invest. 1996;97:2736–2744. doi: 10.1172/JCI118728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chaudhuri P., Colles S.M., Damron D.S., Graham L.M. Lysophosphatidylcholine inhibits endothelial cell migration by increasing intracellular calcium and activating calpain. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2003;23:218–223. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.0000052673.77316.01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosenbaum M.A., Chaudhuri P., Graham L.M. Hypercholesterolemia inhibits re-endothelialization of arterial injuries by TRPC channel activation. J. Vasc. Surg. 2015;62:1040–1047.e1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.04.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chaudhuri P., Rosenbaum M.A., Birnbaumer L., Graham L.M. Integration of TRPC6 and NADPH oxidase activation in lysophosphatidylcholine-induced TRPC5 externalization. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2017;313:C541–C555. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00028.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chaudhuri P., Rosenbaum M.A., Sinharoy P., Damron D.S., Birnbaumer L., Graham L.M. Membrane translocation of TRPC6 channels and endothelial migration are regulated by calmodulin and PI3 kinase activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016;113:2110–2115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600371113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Isshiki M., Ando J., Yamamoto K., Fujita T., Ying Y., Anderson R.G. Sites of Ca(2+) wave initiation move with caveolae to the trailing edge of migrating cells. J. Cell Sci. 2002;115:475–484. doi: 10.1242/jcs.115.3.475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tran P.O., Hinman L.E., Unger G.M., Sammak P.J. A wound-induced [Ca2+]i increase and its transcriptional activation of immediate early genes is important in the regulation of motility. Exp. Cell Res. 1999;246:319–326. doi: 10.1006/excr.1998.4239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chaudhuri P C.S., Bhat M., Birnbaumer V.W., Graham L.M. Elucidation of a TRPC6-TRPC5 channel cascade that restricts endothelial cell movement. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19:3203–3211. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-08-0765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wong JT T.K., Pierce G.N., Chan A.C., O K., Choy P.C. Lysophosphatidylcholine stimulates the release of arachidonic acid in human endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:6830–6836. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.12.6830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Riederer M., Ojala P.J., Hrzenjak A., Graier W.F., Malli R., Tritscher M., Hermansson M., Watzer B., Schweer H., Desoye G., Heinemann A., Frank S. Acyl chain-dependent effect of lysophosphatidylcholine on endothelial prostacyclin production. J. Lipid Res. 2010;51:2957–2966. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M006536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shuttleworth T.J. Arachidonic acid, ARC channels, and Orai proteins. Cell Calcium. 2009;45:602–610. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2009.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dennis E.A., Cao J., Hsu Y.H., Magrioti V., Kokotos G. Phospholipase A2 enzymes: Physical structure, biological function, disease implication, chemical inhibition, and therapeutic intervention. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:6130–6185. doi: 10.1021/cr200085w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Quach N.D., Arnold R.D., Cummings B.S. Secretory phospholipase A2 enzymes as pharmacological targets for treatment of disease. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014;90:338–348. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2014.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Alberghina M. Phospholipase A(2): New lessons from endothelial cells. Microvasc. Res. 2010;80:280–285. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2010.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Herbert S.P., Ponnambalam S., Walker J.H. Cytosolic phospholipase A2-alpha mediates endothelial cell proliferation and is inactivated by association with the Golgi apparatus. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005;16:3800–3809. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-02-0164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Herbert S.P., Odell A.F., Ponnambalam S., Walker J.H. Activation of cytosolic phospholipase A2-{alpha} as a novel mechanism regulating endothelial cell cycle progression and angiogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:5784–5796. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807282200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sommerfelt R.M., Feuerherm A.J., Skuland T., Johansen B. Cytosolic phospholipase A2 modulates TLR2 signaling in synoviocytes. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lei X., Barbour S.E., Ramanadham S. Group VIA Ca2+-independent phospholipase A2 (iPLA2beta) and its role in beta-cell programmed cell death. Biochimie. 2010;92:627–637. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lupo G., Nicotra A., Giurdanella G., Anfuso C.D., Romeo L., Biondi G., Tirolo C., Marchetti B., Ragusa N., Alberghina M. Activation of phospholipase A(2) and MAP kinases by oxidized low-density lipoproteins in immortalized GP8.39 endothelial cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2005;1735:135–150. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2005.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Osterhout J.L., Shuttleworth T.J. A Ca(2+)-independent activation of a type IV cytosolic phospholipase A(2) underlies the receptor stimulation of arachidonic acid-dependent noncapacitative calcium entry. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:8248–8254. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.11.8248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Balsinde J., Dennis E.A. Function of calcium-independent phospholipase A2 in arachidonic acid metabolism in P388D1 macrophages. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1997;407:99–103. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1813-0_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Balsinde J., Dennis E.A. Distinct roles in signal transduction for each of the phospholipase A2 enzymes present in P388D1 macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:6758–6765. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.12.6758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Smani T., Zakharov S.I., Csutora P., Leno E., Trepakova E.S., Bolotina V.M. A novel mechanism for the store-operated calcium influx pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004;6:113–120. doi: 10.1038/ncb1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hooks S.B., Cummings B.S. Role of Ca2+-independent phospholipase A2 in cell growth and signaling. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2008;76:1059–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.07.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lehman J.J., Brown K.A., Ramanadham S., Turk J., Gross R.W. Arachidonic acid release from aortic smooth muscle cells induced by [Arg8]vasopressin is largely mediated by calcium-independent phospholipase A2. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:20713–20716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gross R.W., Rudolph A.E., Wang J., Sommers C.D., Wolf M.J. Nitric oxide activates the glucose-dependent mobilization of arachidonic acid in a macrophage-like cell line (RAW 264.7) that is largely mediated by calcium-independent phospholipase A2. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:14855–14858. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.25.14855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Balboa M.A., Balsinde J. Involvement of calcium-independent phospholipase A2 in hydrogen peroxide-induced accumulation of free fatty acids in human U937 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:40384–40389. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206155200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Perez R., Melero R., Balboa M.A., Balsinde J. Role of group VIA calcium-independent phospholipase A2 in arachidonic acid release, phospholipid fatty acid incorporation, and apoptosis in U937 cells responding to hydrogen peroxide. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:40385–40391. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402562200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sharma J., Turk J., Mancuso D.J., Sims H.F., Gross R.W., McHowat J. Activation of group VI phospholipase A2 isoforms in cardiac endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2011;300:C872–C879. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00289.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hanna V.S., Hafez E.A.A. Synopsis of arachidonic acid metabolism: A review. J. Adv. Res. 2018;11:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2018.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.AL-Shawaf E., Tumova S., Naylor J., Majeed Y., Li J., Beech D.J. GVI phospholipase A2 role in the stimulatory effect of sphingosine-1-phosphate on TRPC5 cationic channels. Cell Calcium. 2011;50:343–350. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Andersson D.A., Nash M., Bevan S. Modulation of the cold-activated channel TRPM8 by lysophospholipids and polyunsaturated fatty acids. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:3347–3355. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4846-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Flemming P.K., Dedman A.M., Xu S.Z., Li J., Zeng F., Naylor J., Benham C.D., Bateson A.N., Muraki K., Beech D.J. Sensing of lysophospholipids by TRPC5 calcium channel. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:4977–4982. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510301200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Beech D.J. Integration of transient receptor potential canonical channels with lipids. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 2012;204:227–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2011.02311.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chaudhuri P., Colles S.M., Fox P.L., Graham L.M. Protein kinase Cdelta-dependent phosphorylation of syndecan-4 regulates cell migration. Circ. Res. 2005;97:674–681. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000184667.82354.b1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Janks L., Sprague R.S., Egan T.M. ATP-gated P2X7 receptors require chloride channels to promote inflammation in human macrophages. J. Immunol. 2019;202:883–898. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chiu C.C., Yeh T.H., Lu C.S., Huang Y.C., Cheng Y.C., Huang Y.Z., Weng Y.H., Liu Y.C., Lai S.C., Chen Y.L., Chen Y.J., Chen C.L., Chen H.Y., Lin Y.W., Wang H.L. PARK14 PLA2G6 mutants are defective in preventing rotenone-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS generation and activation of mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8:79046–79060. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shishehbor M.H., Zhang R., Medina H., Brennan M.L., Brennan D.M., Ellis S.G., Topol E.J., Hazen S.L. Systemic elevations of free radical oxidation products of arachidonic acid are associated with angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2006;41:1678–1683. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cayouette S., Lussier M.P., Mathieu E.L., Bousquet S.M., Boulay G. Exocytotic insertion of TRPC6 channel into the plasma membrane upon Gq protein-coupled receptor activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:7241–7246. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312042200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Murugesan G., Chisolm G.M., Fox P.L. Oxidized low density lipoprotein inhibits the migration of aortic endothelial cells in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 1993;120:1011–1019. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.4.1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Figure S1
mmc1.pdf (204.6KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All the data described in the article are contained within the article.


Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES