Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;6(5):100748. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100748

Table 3.

Comparison of the adapted and predicted plans

Patient #5
Patient #10
Patient #12
Patient #16
Patient #17
Patient #19
Patient #20
Parametern = 7 Objectives Mean pred Mean adapt Mean pred Meanadapt Mean pred Meanadapt Mean pred Meanadapt Mean pred Meanadapt Mean pred Meanadapt Mean pred Meanadapt
PTV V100% (%) ≥50 55.19 56.75 58.58 54.89 38.34 60.53 31.34 59.61 69.91 67.52 43.59 55.49 46.44 63.71
PTV V95% (%) ≥95 90.64 93.90 95.24 97.50 92.14 97.80 89.06 95.96 93.51 92.93 90.30 92.78 91.33 97.00
V27 rectum (cc) <5 0.06 0.12 0.30 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.46 0.82 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
V12 rectum (%) <20 11.41 10.80 11.57 10.95 3.33 3.77 15.80 14.48 20.81 19.16 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.71
V27 bladder (cc) <2 1.00 0.57 1.63 2.09 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.10 0.58 0.64 0.00 0.00
V12 bladder (%) <20 13.63 13.17 6.73 5.48 2.56 2.83 0.01 0.02 5.38 4.35 6.23 5.75 0.00 0.00
V24 urethra + 3 mm (%) <30 29.51 25.46 11.27 9.43 0.00 0.00 5.49 4.65 27.96 26.98 50.28 49.72 15.51 14.73

Abbreviations: Mean pred = mean value for the 5 predicted fractions (ie, before plan adaptation); Mean adapt = mean value for the 5 fractions after plan adaptation; PTV = planning target volume.