Summary of findings 6. Riluzole compared to placebo for adults with depression in bipolar disorder.
Riluzole compared to placebo for adults with depression in bipolar disorder | ||||||
Patient or population: Adults (aged 18 years+) with depression in bipolar disorder Setting: Any setting (outpatient, inpatient, or both) Intervention: riluzole Comparison: placebo | ||||||
Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | № of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Risk with placebo | Risk with riluzole | |||||
Efficacy: number of participants who respond to treatment ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
Efficacy: number of participants who achieve remission ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
Depression rating scale scores ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
Acceptability: total dropouts | Study population | OR 2.00 (0.31 to 12.84) | 19 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ VERY LOW 1 2 | ||
455 per 1,000 | 625 per 1,000 (205 to 915) | |||||
Acceptability: dropouts due to adverse effects ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio. | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |
1 Downgraded by two points due to trial ending prematurely.
2 Downgraded by two points because of small sample size overall and wide confidence intervals across the line of no difference.