Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 17:ehab649. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab649

Table 1.

Summary of artificial intelligence electrocardiogram algorithms and their performance and characteristics

Model Author/Group Test geography hospital vs. development Prospective or retrospective Number of patients tested Disease prevalence (%) Description of controls Hardware specification (12 lead vs. other; specify manufactures/performance of 12 lead) Bias analysis: population reporting (age, sex, race, other) AUC Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
LVSD/HF

Attia et al.2

 

Mayo

All Mayo Clinic Sites Retrospective 52 870 7.8 Low EF confirmed by TTE 12 Lead ECG (GE-Marquette) No formal analysis 0.93 86.3 85.7
LVSD/HF

Attia et al.18

 

Mayo

All Mayo Clinic Sites Prospective 3874 7.0 Low EF confirmed by TTE or HF prediction by NT-proBNP 12 Lead ECG (GE-Marquette) No formal analysis 0.918 82.5 86.8
LVSD/HF

Adedinsewo et al.19

 

Mayo

All Mayo Clinic Sites Retrospective 1606 10.2 Low EF confirmed by TTE 12 Lead ECG (GE-Marquette) Age, Sex 0.89 73.8 87.3
LVSD/HF

Noseworthy et al.20

 

Mayo

All Mayo Clinic Sites Retrospective 52 870 7.8 Low EF confirmed by TTE 12 Lead ECG (GE-Marquette) Race >0.93 in all groups tested
LVSD/HF

Attia et al.21

 

Mayo

Mayo Rochester Prospective 100 7 Low EF confirmed by TTE AI-enhanced ECG-enabled stethoscope (Eko); single lead No formal analysis 0.906
LVSD/HF

Attia et al.22

 

Mayo/Multi-Institution

Know Your Heart Sites

 

(Russia)

Retrospective 4277 0.6 Low EF confirmed by TTE 12 Lead ECG (Cardiax; IMED Ltd, Hungary) Age, sex 0.82 26.9 97.4
LVSD/HF

Cho et al.23

 

Sejong/Korea

Mediplex/Sejong (Korea) Retrospective

IV-2908

 

EV-4176

6.8 Low EF confirmed by echo 12 Lead ECG (Page Writer Cardiograph; Philips, Netherlands) Age, sex, obesity

IV-0.913

 

EV-0.961

IV-90.5

 

EV-91.5

IV-75.6

 

EV-91.1

LVSD/HF

Cho et al.23

 

Sejong/Korea

Mediplex/Sejong (Korea) Retrospective

IV-2908

 

EV-4176

6.8 Low EF confirmed by echo Single lead (LI) from 12 lead ECG (Page Writer Cardiograph; Philips, Netherlands) Performance of all single leads

IV-0.874

 

EV-0.929

IV-93.2

 

EV-92.1

IV-63.2

 

EV-82.1

LVSD/HF

Kwon et al.24

 

Sejong/Korea

Mediplex/Sejong (Korea) Retrospective

IV-3378

 

EV-5901

IV-9.7

 

EV-4.2

Low EF confirmed by echo 12 Lead ECG (Page Writer Cardiograph; Philips, Netherlands) No formal analysis

IV-0.843

 

EV-0.889

IV-n/a

 

EV-90

IV-n/a

 

EV-60.4

HCM

Ko et al.13

 

Mayo

All Mayo Clinic Sites Retrospective 13 400 4.6 Sex/age matched 12 Lead ECG (GE-Marquette) Age, sex, ECG finding 0.96 87 90
HCM

Rahman et al.25

 

Hopkins

 

Queens (CA)

Hopkins

 

Baltimore

Retrospective 762 29.0 Patients with ICD and CM diagnosis 12 Lead ECG (unspecified) No formal analysis

RF-0.94

 

SVM-0.94

RF-87

 

SVM-0.91

RF-92

 

SVF-0.91

Hyperkalaemia

Galloway et al.26

 

Mayo

All Mayo Clinic Sites Retrospective

MN-50 099

 

AZ-5855

 

FL-6011

MN-2.6

 

AZ-4.6

 

FL-4.8

Confirmation by serum potassium 12 Lead ECG (GE-Marquette); 2 Lead evaluation LI/LII No formal analysis

MN-0.883

 

AZ-0.853

 

FL-0.860

MN-90.2

 

AZ-88.9

 

FL-91.3

MN-54.7

 

AZ-55.0

 

FL-54.7

Sex and age >40 years

Attia et al.1

 

Mayo

All Mayo Clinic Sites Retrospective 275 056 n/a Confirmed age/sex in medical record 12 Lead ECG (GE-Marquette) Co-morbidity impact on ECG age

Sex-0.968

 

Age-0.94

Sex-n/a

 

Age-87.8

Sex-n/a

 

Age-86.8

Afib

Attia et al.3

 

Mayo

All Mayo Clinic Sites Retrospective 36 280 8.4 Patients without Afib on prior EKG 12 Lead ECG (GE-Marquette) Analysis with ‘window of interest’ 0.87 79.0 79.5
Afib

Tison et al.27

 

UCSF

Remote study; UCSF Prospective 9750 3.4 12 lead EKG diagnosis of Afib Apple Watch photoplethysmography (Apple Inc.) No formal analysis 0.97 98.0 90.2
Afib

Hill et al.28

 

UK-Multi-institution

UK Retrospective 2 994 837 3.2 CHARGE-AF score Time-varying neural network; based on clinic data and risk scores No formal analysis 0.827 75.0 74.9
Afib

Jo et al.29

 

Sejong/Korea

Multiple sites (Korea) Retrospective

IV-6287

 

EV-38 018

IV-13

 

EV-6.0

Patients without afib 12 lead, 6 lead, and single lead ECG (unspecified) No formal analysis IV/EV for 12, 6, single lead all >0.95 All >98% All >99%
Afib

Poh et al.30

 

Boston

Hong Kong Retrospective 1013 2.8 Patients without afib Photoplethysmographic pulse waveform No formal analysis 0.997 97.6 96.5
Afib Raghunath et al.31 Geisinger Clinic, PA, USA Retrospective 1.6M Patients without afib 12 lead ECG Age, sex, race analysed 0.85 69 81
Long QT (>500 ms)

Giudicessi et al.32

 

Mayo

Mayo Clinic Rochester Both; prospective  data reported 686 3.6 QT expert/lab over-read of 12 lead ECGs 6 lead smartphone-enabled ECG (AliveCor Kardia Mobile 6L) No formal analysis 0.97 80.0 94.4
Long QT

Bos et al.33

 

Mayo

Mayo Clinic Rochester Retrospective 2059 47 Patients without LQTS 12 Lead ECG (GE-Marquette) LQTS genotype subgroup analysis 0.900 83.7 80.6
Multiple Pathologies

Tison et al.34

 

UCSF

UCSF Retrospective 36 816 (ECGs)

HCM-27.4

 

PAH-29.8

 

Amyloid-28.3

 

MVP-21.0

Individual pathologies determined by standard care (i.e. echo, biopsy) 12 Lead ECG (GE-Marquette) No formal analysis

HCM-0.91

 

PAH-0.94

 

Amyloid-0.86

 

MVP-0.77

Mod-Sev AS

Cohen-Shelly et al.6

 

Mayo

All Mayo Clinic Sites Retrospective 102 926 3.7 Mod-Sev AS confirmed by TTE 12 Lead ECG (GE-Marquette) Age, sex 0.85 78 74
Significant AS

Kwon et al.7

 

Sejong/Korea

Mediplex/Sejong (Korea) Retrospective

IV-6453

 

EV-10 865

IV-3.8

 

EV-1.7

Significant AS confirmed by echo 12 Lead ECG (Unspecified) No formal analysis

IV-0.884

 

EV-0.861

IV-80.0

 

EV-80.0

IV-81.4

 

EV-78.3

Significant AS

Kwon et al.7

 

Sejong/Korea

Mediplex/Sejong (Korea) Retrospective

IV-6453

 

EV-10 865

IV-3.8

 

EV-1.7

Significant AS confirmed by echo Single lead (L2) from 12 lead ECG (unspecified) No formal analysis

IV-0.845

 

EV-0.821

Mod-Sev MR

Kwon et al.35

 

Sejong/Korea

Mediplex/Sejong (Korea) Retrospective

IV-3174

 

EV-10 865

IV-n/a

 

EV-3.9

Mod-Sev MR confirmed by echo 12 Lead ECG (Unspecified) No formal analysis

IV 0.816

 

EV 0.877

IV 0.900

 

EV 0.901

IV 0.533

 

EV 0.699

Mod-Sev MR

Kwon et al.35

 

Sejong/Korea

Mediplex/Sejong (Korea) Retrospective

IV-3174

 

EV-10 865

IV-n/a

 

EV 3.9

Mod-Sev MR confirmed by echo Single lead (aVR) from 12 lead ECG (unspecified) No formal analysis

IV 0.758

 

EV 0.850

IV 0.900

 

EV 0.901

IV 0.408

 

EV 0.560

Afib, atrial fibrillation; AI, artificial intelligence; AUC, area under the curve; AZ, Arizona; CA, Canada; ECG, electrocardiogram; echo, echocardiography; EV, external validation; FL, Florida; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; HF, heart failure; ICD, implantable cardiac defibrillator; IV, internal validation; LVSD, left ventricular systolic dysfunction; LQTS, long QT syndrome; MN, Minnesota; mod-sev AS, moderate to severe aortic stenosis; mod-sev MR, moderate to severe mitral regurgitation; MVP, mitral valve prolapse; NT-proBNP, N-terminus of brain natriuretic peptide; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; RF, random forest classifier; SVM, support vector machine classifier; TTE, transthoracic echocardiogram.