Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 1:daab144. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab144

Table 2:

Characteristics of included studies

Reference Year Location Pandemic Racially minoritized group (sub-group where available) Study participants Methods Quality assessmenta
Abidin and Zeng, 2020 2020 Global (Online) COVID-19 Asian Facebook users, sample/demographic data unavailable Qualitative analysis of social media posts 0.35
Baptist et al., 2020 2020 USA COVID-19 African/Hispanic Adults with asthma (n = 118) (not racially disaggregated) Survey 0.95
Cheah et al., 2020 2020 USA COVID-19 Asian (Chinese) Parents (n = 543), their children (n = 230) Survey 0.95
Choi et al., 2020 2020 USA COVID-19 Asian (Korean) Adults (n = 790) Survey 0.95
Eichelberger, 2007 2007 USA SARS Asian (Chinese) Community members (residents, business owners, employees of China Town) (n = 37) Semi-structured interviews 0.85
Iob et al., 2020 2020 UK COVID-19 African/Asian Adults (n = 5259) Survey 1.00
Liu et al., 2020 2020 USA COVID-19 African/Hispanic/Asian Black (n = 229), Hispanic (n = 317), Asian (n = 96) Survey 1.00
McCauley et al., 2013 2013 USA H1N1 African/Hispanic African (n = 13), Hispanic (n = 13) Focus groups 0.90
Pang, 2021 2021 UK COVID-19 Asian (Chinese) Adults, Children (11–15 years), N not stated Interviews, field notes 0.80
Person et al., 2004 2004 USA SARS Asian 70 Key informants Focus groups 0.75
Rzymski and Nowicki, 2020 2020 Poland COVID-19 Asian (Chinese) Medical students (n = 85) Survey 0.79
Schoch-Spana et al., 2010 2010 USA H1N1 Hispanic (Mexican) Key community informants (n = 33) Interviews 0.80
Siu, 2015 2015 Hong Kong Ebola African African residents with a chronic illness (n = 30) Semi-structured interviews 0.85
Smith-Morris, 2017 2017 USA Ebola African, Hispanic (Mexican) African (n = 10), Mexican (n = 3) Interviews, ethnography 0.90
Yang et al., 2020 2020 USA COVID-19 Asian Adults (n = 242) Survey 0.86
Zheng et al., 2005 2005 Japan SARS Asian (Chinese) Students (n = 161) Semi-structured questionnaire 0.75
a

Two independent reviewers used the QualSyst tool (Kmet et al. 2004) for mixed method studies to assess quality