Table 1.
PubMed | Embase | Web of Science | Cochrane Library | Google Scholar | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identification | 200 | 187 | 173 | 5 | 604 | 121,000 |
Screening | ||||||
Repeats | 2 | 75 | 162 | 5 | 420 | 342 |
Not country studied | 13 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 53 | 0 |
Not-teleophthalmology | 8 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 |
Case Study | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Guidelines | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not in English/no information | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Outside time period | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Eligibility | ||||||
Not a model of care | 43 | 66 | 3 | 0 | 105 | 120,879 |
Included articles | 132 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
Total discrete models of care | 122 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total: 132 discrete models of care |
Notes: Adapted from: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-269,W64. Copyright the authors. Creative Commons.137