Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 8;100(40):e27473. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027473

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis of FOXP4-AS1 expression and OS for patients with OVs in the validation cohort.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Characteristic Hazard ratio (95% CI) P Hazard ratio (95% CI) P
FIGO stage (Stage I–II vs. Stage III–IV) 2.085 (0.925–4.699) .076 2.817 (0.691–11.485) .149
Histologic grade (G1–2 vs G3–4) 1.194 (0.797–1.789) .389
Primary therapy outcome (SD-PD vs PR-CR) 0.306 (0.207–0.451) <.001 0.313 (0.206–0.474) <.001
Age (<60 vs >=60) 1.329 (1.025–1.722) .032 1.204 (0.881–1.645) .243
Tumor residual (NRD vs RD) 2.302 (1.479–3.583) <.001 2.062 (1.243–3.419) .005
Lymphatic invasion (NO vs YES) 1.422 (0.839–2.411) .191
Venous invasion (NO vs YES) 0.905 (0.487–1.683) .753
Anatomic subdivision (unilateral vs bilateral) 1.041 (0.768–1.41) .798
FOXP4-AS1 (low vs high) 0.685 (0.528–0.889) .004 0.638 (0.467–0.871) .005

CI = confidence interval, CR = complete remission, NRD = no residual disease, OS = overall survival, OVs = ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma, PD = progressive disease, PR = partial remission, RD = residual disease, SD = stable disease.