Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 27;60:155–162. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.09.006

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Authors, year Setting Program BRCAm/Tot∗ Study groups available for comparison Design of the study Age Restriction or matching for major confounding factors/adjusted variables
Titus S, 2013 BC ART (FP) 24/84 15 BRCAlm BC Prospective 18–42 Age, ovarian dysfunction
9 BRCA2m BC
BRCAm 1 + 2
60 WT
Wang ET, 2014 Cancer-free S 89/143 62 BRCA1m Cross-sectional study 18–45 Age, BMI, smoke, HC
27 BRCA2m
BRCAm 1 + 2
54 WT
Phillips KA, 2016 Cancer-free S 319/535 216 WT Prospective 25–45 Age, BMI, smoke, HC
172 BRCA1m
147 BRCA2m
Giordano S, 2016 Cancer-free S 68/124 68 BRCA1m Retrospective 18–45 Age, BMI, HC, smoke, PCOS
56 WT
Johnson L, 2017 Cancer-free S 105/131 55 BRCA1 Prospective 18–45 Age, BMI, HC, smoke
50 BRCA2
26 WT
Ben-Aharon I, 2018 Cancer-free S 33/48 33 BRCAm 1 + 2 Prospective 24–40 Age
15 WT
Porcu E, 2019 BC ART (FP) 22/46 11 BRCA1 BC Prospective 18–40 Age, BMI
11 BRCA2 BC
24 WT BC
Gunnala V, 2019 Cancer- free and BC" ART (FP) 49/102 38 BRCAm 1 + 2 (BC) Retrospective Up to 40 Age, BMI
53 WT (BC)
BRCAm sub-groups:
31 BRCAm 1 (BC + cancer-free) 18 BRCAm 2 (BC + cancer-free)
Grynberg, 2019 BC ART (FP) 52/329 52 BRCAm 1 + 2 Retrospective 18–40 Age, BMI
277 WT
Ponce 2020 Cancer- free S 69/135 32 BRCA1 Retrospective 18–45 Age, PCOS, smoke, BMI, HC
37 BRCA2
66 WT

BC: breast cancer; S: surveillance; ART: assisted reproductive technology; FP: fertility preservation; WT: wild type; HC: hormonal contraceptive use.

∗tot. = BRCAm + wild type (confirmed by BRCA test).

# The cancer-free BRCAm carriers (n = 19) were not considered for the comparison with the cancer-free group without mutation (cancer-free control group).

(n = 600), since the cancer-free control group was not tested for BRCA and was defined only as low risk.