Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 10;18:149. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00942-z

Table 5.

As-treated and per-protocol analyses of primary and secondary walking outcomes

Variable As-treated Per-protocol
Exoskeleton n = 14 Usual Care n = 22 p-value Exoskeleton n = 14 Usual Care n = 17 p-value
FAC, median (IQR)
 Baseline 0 (0–1) 0 (0–1) 0 (0–1) 0 (0–1)
 Discharge 4 (3–4) 3 (2–4) 4 (3–4) 3 (3–4)
  Change from baseline 3 (2–4) 2.5 (2–3) 0.12a 3 (2–4) 3 (2–3) 0.40a
 6-month follow-up 4.5 (4–5) 4 (2.25–4) 4.5 (4–5) 4 (3–5)
  Change from baseline 4 (3–4.75) 3 (2–4) 0.09a 4 (3–4.75) 3 (3–4) 0.40a
Gait speed, m/s, mean (SD)
 Discharge 0.47 (0.3) 0.30 (0.3) 0.15a 0.47 (0.3) 0.35 (0.3) 0.31b
 6-month follow-up 0.67 (0.5) 0.35 (0.3) 0.04a 0.67 (0.5) 0.42 (0.3) 0.10b
6MWT, m, mean (SD)
 Discharge 145.8 (110.2) 80.1 (85.0) 0.08a 145.8 (110.2) 93.0 (84.0) 0.14b
 6-month follow-up 211.2 (147.2) 103.0 (93.5) 0.03a 211.2 (147.2) 123.4 (90.1) 0.05b
Days to unassisted walkingc 24.1 (9.7) 36.7 (16.1) 0.03b 24.1 (9.7) 35.3 (15.7) 0.05b

6MWT 6-minute walk test, FAC Functional Ambulation Category, IQR interquartile range, SD standard deviation

aAnalyzed using Mann–Whitney U test

bAnalyzed using independent t-test

cExoskeleton n = 11, Usual Care (as-treated) n = 15, Usual Care (per-protocol) n = 14

Bold indicates a significant p-value < 0.05