Table 1.
Characteristic of index case | Index casesa | Incident SARS-CoV-2 cases among 14 591 exposed high-risk contacts, during 14 days of follow-up (quarantine) N = 441 cohorts | Index casesb | Incident SARS-CoV-2 clusters among high-risk contacts, during 14 days of follow-up (quarantine) N = 784 cohorts | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Secondary cases (clusters) | No. of contacts | % Contacts with PCR | SAR (%) [95% CI] | Crude IRR [95% CI] | P-value | Clusters (secondary cases) | Mean cluster size | Cluster risk [95% CI] | Crude RR [95% CI] | P-value | |||
Role | |||||||||||||
Student/child | 346 | 99 (53) | 10 716 | 87.47 | 0.92 [0.64–1.29] | 1.00 | ref | 591 | 76 (145) | 1.9 | 0.13 [0.10–0.16] | 1.00 | ref |
Teacher | 75 | 91 (25) | 2858 | 92.93 | 3.18 [1.95–4.89] | 3.17 [1.79–5.59] | <0.001 | 157 | 48 (169) | 3.5 | 0.31 [0.23–0.38] | 2.38 [1.73–3.26] | <0.001 |
unknown | 20 | 6 (3) | 1017 | 95.97 | 0.59 [0.09–1.93] | 0.77 [0.23–2.63] | 0.68 | 36 | 6 (15) | 2.5 | 0.17 [0.06–0.33] | 1.30 [0.61–2.77] | 0.50 |
Symptom status | |||||||||||||
Symptomatic | 300 | 166 (64) | 10 566 | 88.11 | 1.57 [1.12–2.14] | 1.00 | ref | 550 | 100 (262) | 2.6 | 0.18 [0.15–0.22] | 1.00 | ref |
Asymptomatic | 127 | 21 (13) | 3523 | 91.26 | 0.60 [0.25–1.19] | 0.47 [0.25–0.89] | 0.02 | 203 | 24 (55) | 2.3 | 0.12 [0.08–0.17] | 0.65 [0.43–0.99] | 0.04 |
Unknown | 14 | 9 (4) | 502 | 95.62 | 1.79 [0.43–4.84] | 1.34 [0.37–4.85] | 0.65 | 31 | 6 (12) | 2.0 | 0.19 [0.07–0.37] | 1.06 [0.51–2.23] | 0.87 |
Type of institutionc | |||||||||||||
Day-care (0–6 years) | 99 | 110 (32) | 4392 | 90.64 | 2.50 [1.60–3.72] | 3.23 [1.76–5.91] | <0.001 | 205 | 61 (203) | 3.3 | 0.30 [0.24–0.37] | 2.78 [1.88–4.10] | <0.001 |
Primary schools | 88 | 27 (15) | 2389 | 85.64 | 1.13 [0.57–1.99] | 1.62 [0.80–3.31] | 0.18 | 157 | 21 (40) | 1.9 | 0.13 [0.08–0.20] | 1.25 [0.75–2.09] | 0.40 |
Secondary schools | 173 | 41 (25) | 5970 | 90.08 | 0.69 [0.39–1.12] | 1.00 | ref | 299 | 32 (50) | 1.6 | 0.11 [0.07–0.15] | 1.00 | ref |
Vocational schools | 52 | 5 (4) | 1181 | 84.17 | 0.42 [0.10–1.14] | 0.65 [0.21–1.99] | 0.45 | 70 | 8 (14) | 1.8 | 0.11 [0.05–0.21] | 1.07 [0.51–2.22] | 0.18 |
Other/unknown | 29 | 13 (5) | 659 | 91.96 | 1.97 [0.44–5.46] | 2.99 [1.12–7.98] | 0.03 | 53 | 8 (22) | 2.8 | 0.15 [0.07–0.28] | 1.41 [0.69–2.89] | 0.35 |
Age | |||||||||||||
0–5 years | 42 | 31 (11) | 1828 | 90.43 | 1.70 [0.79–3.18] | 1.29 [0.55–3.03] | 0.55 | 77 | 18 (45) | 2.5 | 0.23 [0.14–0.34] | 2.00 [1.14–3.53] | 0.02 |
6–10 years | 89 | 15 (12) | 2410 | 82.53 | 0.62 [0.29–1.17] | 0.72 [0.32–1.63] | 0.43 | 155 | 18 (31) | 1.7 | 0.12 [0.07–0.18] | 1.00 [0.56–1.79] | 0.99 |
11–15 years | 113 | 35 (20) | 3358 | 89.93 | 1.04 [0.55–1.80] | 1.00 | ref | 189 | 22 (38) | 1.7 | 0.12 [0.07–0.17] | 1.00 | ref |
16–20 years | 90 | 17 (9) | 2884 | 88.04 | 0.59 [0.21–1.30] | 0.56 [0.25–1.24] | 0.15 | 157 | 16 (37) | 2.3 | 0.10 [0.06–0.16] | 0.88 [0.48–1.61] | 0.67 |
21–34 years | 42 | 30 (13) | 1321 | 88.19 | 2.27 [1.02–4.33] | 1.97 [0.84–4.64] | 0.12 | 80 | 23 (50) | 2.2 | 0.29 [0.19–0.40] | 2.47 [1.46–4.17] | 0.001 |
35 years and older | 45 | 62 (13) | 1773 | 93.80 | 3.50 [1.80–6.07] | 2.80 [1.27–6.20] | 0.01 | 90 | 27 (113) | 4.2 | 0.30 [0.21–0.41] | 2.58 [1.56–4.27] | <0.001 |
unknown | 20 | 6 (3) | 1017 | 95.97 | 0.59 [0.09–1.93] | 0.65 [0.18–2.35] | 0.51 | 36 | 6 (15) | 2.5 | 0.17 [0.06–0.33] | 1.43 [0.62–3.28] | 0.40 |
Type of groups | |||||||||||||
Stable groups | 313 | 80 (52) | 8650 | 88.15 | 0.92 [0.66–1.26] | 1.00 | ref | 536 | 75 (123) | 1.6 | 0.14 [0.11–0.17] | 1.00 | ref |
Dynamic groups | 111 | 91 (25) | 5430 | 90.90 | 1.68 [1.04–2.56] | 1.45 [0.84–2.50] | 0.18 | 199 | 44 (168) | 3.8 | 0.22 [0.17–0.29] | 1.58 [1.13–2.21] | 0.007 |
Unknown | 17 | 25 (4) | 511 | 86.89 | 4.89 [1.16–12.91] | 3.21 [1.07–9.59] | 0.04 | 49 | 11 (38) | 3.5 | 0.22 [0.12–0.37] | 1.60 [0.92–2.81]. | 0.10 |
Sex | |||||||||||||
Female | 194 | 66 (33) | 5808 | 88.86 | 1.14 [0.70–1.73] | 1.00 | ref | 332 | 43 (89) | 2.1 | 0.13 [0.10–0.17] | 1.00 | ref |
Male | 241 | 128 (47) | 8555 | 89.32 | 1.50 [0.99–2.16] | 0.78 [0.46–1.31] | 0.35 | 441 | 86 (238) | 2.8 | 0.20 [0.16–0.24] | 0.66 [0.47–0.93] | 0.02 |
Unknown | 6 | 2 (1) | 228 | 89.04 | 0.88 [0.00–7.01] | 0.64 [0.07–5.67] | 0.69 | 11 | 1 (2) | 2.0 | 0.09 [0–0.41] | 0.47 [0.07–3.05] | 0.43 |
Month of infection | |||||||||||||
August | 33 | 6 (5) | 909 | 97.36 | 0.66 [0.19–1.65] | 1.00 | ref | 33 | 5 (6) | 1.2 | 0.15 [0.05–0.32] | 1.00 | ref |
September | 78 | 9 (9) | 2548 | 97.84 | 0.35 [0.16–0.67] | 0.45 [0.12–1.78] | 0.26 | 78 | 9 (9) | 1.0 | 0.12 [0.05–0.21] | 0.76 [0.28–2.10] | 0.60 |
October | 95 | 84 (23) | 3986 | 93.15 | 2.11 [1.23–3.35] | 1.92 [0.58–6.42] | 0.29 | 149 | 24 (85) | 3.5 | 0.16 [0.11–0.23] | 1.06 [0.44–2.58] | 0.89 |
November | 151 | 74 (30) | 4492 | 85.28 | 1.65 [1.03–2.50] | 1.77 [0.55–5.75] | 0.34 | 349 | 56 (150) | 2.7 | 0.16 [0.12–0.20] | 1.06 [0.46–2.46] | 0.89 |
December | 84 | 23 (14) | 2656 | 78.43 | 0.87 [0.38–1.69] | 1.11 [0.32–3.91] | 0.87 | 175 | 36 (79) | 2.2 | 0.21 [0.15–0.27] | 1.36 [0.58–3.20] | 0.49 |
Total | 441 | 196 (81) | 14 591 | 89.09 | 1.34 [0.99–1.78] | n.a. | n.a. | 784 | 130 (329) | 2.5 | 0.17 [0.14–0.19] | n.a. | n.a. |
Left side of the table displays secondary attack rates (SARs), defined as the proportion of SARS-CoV-2-PCR positive secondary cases in a given cohort of close contact persons around that index case. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) and P-values from negative binomial regression in 14 591 high-risk contacts clustered in cohorts around 441 index cases compare the mean count of secondary cases per index-cohort by the characteristic of index case, where an IRR of 1.0 corresponds to H0 = ‘there is no difference in the SAR between groups’. The analyses take account of the clustering of secondary cases within index cases. The right side of the table displays the cluster risk, i.e. the risk of causing at least one secondary infection among high-risk contacts, and associated risk ratios (RRs) from binomial regression for the comparison between groups, where an RR of 1.0 corresponds to H0 = ‘there is no difference in cluster risk between comparison groups’.
Subgroup of index cases with complete information on a number of contact persons and a number of PCR tests.
Complete study population, i.e. presents additional data on secondary cases around index cases with incomplete information on negative PCR tests in close contact persons, thus not allowing to calculate SARs.
Presented data include teachers.