. 2021 Oct 5;7(6):e185. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.1020

Table 2.

Quality assessment AGREE-II scores (n = 10)

Clinical practice guideline	Agree-II domain						Rating
Clinical practice guideline	Scope and purpose	Stakeholder involvement	Rigor of development	Clarity of presentation	Applicability	Editorial independence	Combined overall rating	Three key domains score^a	Non-key domains score^b
Grupo de Trabajo, 2018³⁸	100	83	71	89	58	100	83	85	82
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2019³⁷	83	72	72	83	83	92	92	79	83
MacQueen et al, 2016⁴¹	89	78	70	67	60	83	75	77	72
Beyond Blue, 2011⁴²	69	81	63	92	52	83	83	76	71
Cheung et al, 2018⁴³	97	75	82	92	42	71	83	76	77
Driot et al, 2020⁴⁴	67	83	44	44	29	75	50	67	47
Seo et al, 2018⁴⁵	75	64	50	78	56	71	67	62	70
Ministerio de Salud, 2013a⁴⁶	89	61	58	72	29	42	67	54	63
Garland et al, 2016⁴⁷	78	53	63	56	48	42	58	53	61
Ministerio de Salud, 2013b⁴⁸	83	61	67	67	29	25	67	51	60

AGREE-II, Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, Second Edition.

^a.

Three key domains (stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, editorial independence).

^b.

Non-key domains (scope and purpose, clarity of presentation, applicability); high-quality score ≥70; minimum quality score 50 to <70; low-quality score <50.