Table 7.
Comparison of without fusion and fusion methods with the proposed LMPL classifier in Experiment 2: COVID-19, SARS, and MERS pneumonia.
| Method | Performance Metrics (%) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (Recall) | Precision (PPV) | F1-score | Accuracy | Average Rank | ||
| Without Fusion | preRelu | 95.74 (8) | 96.03 (8) | 95.88 (8) | 96.29 (8) | 8.0 |
| postRelu | 96.64 (5) | 96.29 (7) | 96.46 (7) | 96.86 (7) | 6.5 | |
| Concat | Classical | 97.94 (4) | 96.97 (4) | 97.44 (4) | 97.72 (4) | 4.0 |
| DCA | 96.44 (7) | 96.88 (5) | 96.66 (5) | 97.00 (5) | 5.5 | |
| CCA | 98.66 (2) | 97.87 (2) | 98.26 (2) | 98.43 (2) | 2.0 | |
| Sum | Classical | 98.10 (3) | 97.39 (3) | 97.74 (3) | 98.00 (3) | 3.0 |
| DCA | 96.48 (6) | 96.58 (6) | 96.52 (6) | 97.00 (5) | 5.8 | |
| CCA | 98.89 (1) | 98.56 (1) | 98.73 (1) | 98.86 (1) | 1.0 | |
*Bold numbers indicate the best performance.