LEVANT I 2014.
Methods | Study design: randomized controlled trial Method of randomization: sequentially numbered sealed envelopes in blocks of 4 via computer‐generated random numbers Blinding: single‐blind (participants) Exclusions postrandomization: 0 Losses to follow‐up: 5 (at 6‐month follow‐up) Study enrollment period: June 2009 to December 2009 Cross‐over: 0 |
|
Participants | Country: Europe and USA Setting: 9 hospitals Number of participants: 101 Age (mean ± SD): 67 ± 8 (DEB), 70 ± 10 (PTA) Gender: male: DEB 34 (69%), PTA 30 (58%) Rutherford class: DEB: class 2: 22%, class 3: 72%, class 4: 2%, class 5: 4%; PTA: class 2: 21%, class 3: 71%, class 4: 4%, class 5: 4% ABI (± SD): DEB: 0.69 ± 0.23, PTA: 0.60 ± 0.36 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions | Uncoated balloon angioplasty: 52 (of whom 38 did not receive a stent) Uncoated balloon angioplasty device: unspecified "standard PTA balloon" DEB: 49 (of whom 37 did not receive a stent) DEB device: Lutonix DEB (C.R. Bard, New Hope, MN) Drug used: paclitaxel 2 μg/mm2 balloon surface Vessels treated: femoropopliteal arteries Anticoagulation/platelets: according to local clinical practice. ASA 100 mg/day to 325 mg/day indefinitely and clopidogrel loading dose (75 mg or 300 mg) with maintenance for 1 month in balloon‐only participants and 3 months in stented participants Predilation before DEB: yes |
|
Outcomes | Primary:
Secondary:
|
|
Notes | 25% of enrolled participants received a stent Clinical follow‐up at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after the procedure Angiography of the treated limb performed at 6 months Duplex ultrasound, Rutherford classification, ABI, and WIQ evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months Sponsor: C.R. Bard (New Hope, MN) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "Subjects in each stratum (intended balloon‐only or intended stenting) were randomized 1:1 to Lutonix DCB or uncoated balloon (control group) using sequentially numbered sealed envelopes in blocks of 4 via computer‐generated random numbers" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | "Subjects in each stratum (intended balloon‐only or intended stenting) were randomized 1:1 to Lutonix DCB or uncoated balloon (control group) using sequentially numbered sealed envelopes in blocks of 4 via computer‐generated random numbers" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | The trial was "single blind" (to participant) |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Primary outcome assessed by "independent, blinded angiographic core lab analysis". "Major adverse events were independently adjudicated by a Clinical events committee" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | "Six‐month angiographic follow‐up for the primary endpoint was available for 39 patients (80%) in the Lutonix DCB group and 36 (69%) in the uncoated balloon group, due in part to 4 deaths and 5 withdrawals" |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All primary and secondary endpoint data reported |
Other bias | High risk | 8 DEB devices (16%) malfunctioned and failed to deploy properly. Antiplatelet therapy regimens varied across sites and anticoagulation protocol with heparin not specified |