PACIFIER 2012.
Methods | Study design: randomized controlled trial Method of randomization: computer generated, in blocks of 10 participants Blinding: single‐blind (participants) Exclusions postrandomization: 0 Losses to follow‐up: 4 participants at 6 months, 10 participants at 12 months Study enrollment period: 2010 to 2011 Cross‐over: 0 |
|
Participants | Country: Germany Setting: hospital (3 centers) Number of participants: 85 (91 intervention procedures, 1 target lesion per procedure) Age (mean ± SD): 71 ± 7 years (DEB), 71 ± 9 years (PTA) Gender: males: DEB 26 (59%), PTA 30 (64%) Rutherford class: DEB: class 2: 9.1%, class 3: 86.4%, class 4: 0%, class 5: 4.5%; PTA: class 2: 12.8%, class 3: 83%, class 4: 4.3%, class 5: 0% ABI: DEB: 0.73 ± 0.30, PTA: 0.65 ± 0.26 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions | Uncoated balloon angioplasty: 47 procedures in 44 participants Uncoated balloon angioplasty device: Pacific Xtreme (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) DEB: 44 procedures in 41 participants DEB device: IN.PACT Pacific (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) Drug used: paclitaxel 3 μg/mm2 balloon surface Vessels treated: femoropopliteal arteries Anticoagulation/platelets: all participants were pretreated with ASA and thienopyridines, which were continued for > 2 months after PTA Predilation before DEB: yes: DEB 6 cases (13.6%), PTA 3 cases (6.4%) |
|
Outcomes | Primary:
Secondary:
|
|
Notes | Follow‐up to 24 months reported Stents provisionally implanted in 9 (20.5%) DEB cases and 16 (34%) PTA cases Sponsor: Medtronic (Santa Rosa, CA) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "The randomization sequence was computer generated, in blocks of 10 patients each" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | "Allocation concealment was guaranteed by the use of numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, which were only opened after the decision was made that the patient had to be treated according to the protocol" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | "Blinding of investigators after assignment of a patient to a treatment is not possible due to differences in the appearance of coated and uncoated catheters" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Primary endpoint "assessed by blinded angiographic core lab quantitative analyses" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Missing primary outcome data on 20.5% of DEB arm and 27.3% of control arm |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All primary and secondary endpoint data reported |
Other bias | High risk | 21% of DEB and 34% of control participants were stented but little discussion of outcomes in those participants. Baseline risk characteristics such as smoking and diabetes were unevenly distributed between DEB and control arms. Dosing and duration of antiplatelet therapies were unclear |