Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0258268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258268

Table 4. Logistic regression models of associations between oral-related productivity loss last year and individual characteristics among adults aged ≥30 years who completed the dental examination and at least the first 24-hour dietary recall interview, had at least one natural tooth, and provided an answer about oral-related productivity loss in the National Health and Nutrition and Examination Survey (NHANES); 2015–2018.

Variable Unadjusted OR (95%CI) p-value Adjusted OR (95%CI) p-value
Had oral pain
 No Ref§ Ref
 Yes 22.50 (13.86–36.54) <0.001 13.85 (8.07–23.77) <0.001
Age categories
 30–34 Ref Ref
 35–49 1.17(0.76–1.80) 0.454 1.42 (0.92–2.19) 0.105
 50–64 1.28 (0.77–2.13) 0.323 1.68 (0.90–3.13) 0.098
 >=65 0.67 (0.40–1.14) 0.138 1.48 (0.81–2.68) 0.192
Sex
 Male Ref Ref
 Female 1.08 (0.73–1.60) 0.687 1.25 (0.77–2.03) 0.356
Race/Ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White Ref Ref
 Non-Hispanic Black 2.51 (1.69–3.72) <0.001 1.13 (0.70–1.84) 0.605
 Hispanic 2.38 (1.64–3.48) <0.001 1.43 (0.99–2.08) 0.054
 Non-Hispanic Asian 1.61 (0.95–2.73) 0.074 1.88 (1.18–3.00) 0.010
 Other, including multi-racial 2.41 (1.27–4.57) 0.009 0.91 (0.37–2.23) 0.839
Education Levels
 Less than high school Ref Ref
 High school 0.53 (0.38–0.73) <0.001 0.86 (0.55–1.35) 0.500
 More than high school 0.18 (0.13–0.25) <0.001 0.46 (0.30–0.73) 0.001
Family income ratio to FPL 1
 <100%FPL Ref Ref
 100%-199% FPL 0.44 (0.30–0.66) <0.001 0.58 (0.38–0.87) 0.011
 200%-399% FPL 0.24 (0.17–0.33) <0.001 0.47 (0.31–0.71) 0.001
 400% 0.06 (0.04–0.10) <0.001 0.24 (0.15–0.37) <0.001
Total sugar consumption (each additional 10gm) 1.05 (1.02–1.07) <0.001 1.02 (0.99–1.05) 0.134
Presence of teeth with untreated caries 2
 No Ref Ref
 Yes 5.28 (4.01–6.95) <0.001 2.18 (1.65–2.89) <0.001
Presence of teeth with fillings 2
 No Ref Ref
 Yes 0.36 (0.24–0.56) <0.001 0.74 (0.41–1.35) 0.320
Presence of non-carious root lesions
 No Ref Ref
 Yes 1.12 (0.83–1.51) 0.447 0.99 (0.74–1.32) 0.966
Presence of non-carious root restoration
 No Ref Ref
 Yes 0.37 (0.12–1.11) 0.074 0.82 (0.24–2.78) 0.806

Adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education levels, income, presence of teeth with untreated caries, teeth with fillings, root non-carious root lesions and restorations.

OR: Odds ratio.

95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

§Ref: Reference group.

1Family income ratio to the federal poverty level (<100%, 100–199%, 200–399%, >400%).

2Including coronal and root surfaces.