STIC Study.
Methods |
Design: Multicentre, multinational, non‐inferiority RCT (74 centres, 12 countries) Follow‐up period: 14‐28 days |
|
Participants |
N: 804 participants randomised; 134 participants with DFI For all included participants: Sex (%male): 60.6% Age (mean): Intervention Group: 52.1 years; Control Group: 51.0 years Inclusion criteria: ≥ 18 years with a cSSSI or SSSI (DFI, necrotizing fasciitis, post‐surgical wound infection, complicated cellulitis, complicated erysipelas, major abscess of the skin, infection of traumatic lesion, and infected ischaemic ulcer) at one site only; requiring systemic antimicrobial therapy; sample culture taken within 24 h prior to inclusion Exclusion criteria: uncomplicated mild‐to‐moderate SSSIs; secondary infected burns; atopic dermatitis; eczema; pregnancy; nursing; life expectancy < 2 months; end‐stage liver cirrhosis; dialysis; septic shock; chronic immunosuppressant treatment; neutropenia ≤ 1000 cells/ml; AIDS with CD4 < 200 cells/μl; HIV with highly activated antiretroviral treatment; syndromes of QTc prolongation or medication that increases the QTc; hypersensitivity to study drugs; tendinopathy with quinolones; SSSI secondary to prosthetic materials; > 18% of the skin and soft tissue affected; osteomyelitis not related to DFI; requirement for systemic concomitant antibacterial agents; failure to respond to previous antibacterial treatment if it contained a fluoroquinolone, amoxicillin or a beta‐lactam/beta‐lactamase inhibitor combination; systemic antibacterial treatment for > 24 h within the 24 h before enrolment |
|
Interventions |
Intervention (n = 63)::moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily iv followed by moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily po. Control (n = 71): amoxicillin‐clavulanate 1000 mg/200 mg iv every 8 h followed by amoxicillin‐clavulanate 500 mg/125 mg po every 8 h Switch from iv to po therapy was decided by the investigator based on clinical response Treatment duration: iv for at least 3 days; po for 7‐21 days Co‐interventions: surgery at investigator's discretion |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcome
Secondary outcome
|
|
Notes |
Financial source: Bayer; 4 authors were employees of Bayer Other: sample size calculation not reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | The study was defined as randomised. No additional data described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | The study was defined as randomised. No additional data described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No sample size calculation described. Reasons for withdrawal were described and there were no differences between groups (P value > 0.1) Failures were carried forward for the efficacy analysis; ITT and per protocol analysis |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Only data on TOC assessment (14‐28 days) reported. Other assessments were made but not reported: prior to therapy, during treatment (days 1‐3), and day of switch to po |
Other bias | Unclear risk | NA |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Evaluations were performed by investigators (unblinded) |